(More New Insight Knowledge About Ancient Rome and Importation of Aeneas)



Stewart Perowne, in his Introduction to a book by Peter Croft entitled "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY", writes  [8]:

"’ANCIENT ROME’ – to us the two words are almost synonymous.  When we think of antiquity, it is to Rome that our thoughts automatically turn; and the mere sound of the word Rome is to our ears like the echo of some melancholy passing-bell, tolling for the demise of a glory that is no more.

But the Romans did not think in those terms at all. For them Rome was forever young and sprightly, ‘eternal’ in fact, an epithet the Romans themselves applied to their city as early as the later days of the Republic.  They celebrated Rome’s birthday every year on the 21st April, as they still do.  It is beyond question, this feeling of eternity which has made, and still keeps, Rome unique.  But in Roman eyes, Rome’s youth did have one disadvantage: it implied lack of lineage of august ancestry.  In the early days this did not matter very much: Rome was just a village, or union of willages, like others, Veii, or Alba Longa or Terracina; but when Rome became a ruling power, first in Italy then beyond its shores and finally the ruling power par excellence, it mattered very much indeed.  In particular it mattered in Rome’s dealings with three other nations, first the Greeks (and they, be it remembered, included the Greeks of what is now Southern Turkey, ‘Asia Minor’, one of the most fertile seed-beds of Greek genius), then the Egyptians, who seemed to be older than anyone, certainly older than Homer, and finally the Persians, or Parthians. With the Parthians Rome never came to any amicable understanding, and the fatal antagonism between the two races which lasted until both peoples went down before alien invaders in the seventh century of our era was one of the most destructive oppositions in the whole recorded history of mankind."

Polat Kaya: One of the most prominent names of the city of Rome (Roma) is "The Eternal City".  Let us first clearly understand the term "ETERNAL" which signifies a godly concept.

The term ETERNAL is defined as: "1. Having neither beginning nor end of existence; infinite in duration. 2. Having no end; everlasting.  3. Continued without interruption; perpetual. 4. Independent of time or its conditions, or of the things that are perishable; unchangeable; immutable. 5 Of or pertaining to eternity. 6. Appearing interminable; perpetual; incessant. One who or that which is everlasting; the ETERNAL GOD. [from Old French (before 1400 A.D.), from Late Latin (200-600 A.D.) "AETERNALIS" from "AETERNUS" from "AEVUM" an age.]" [9]

Anybody who reads this dictionary definition for the term ETERNAL and its etymology will come to the conclusion that it is an Indo-European concept with its roots in the Indo-European languages. Nothing could be further from the truth.  This definition of the term "ETERNAL" is nothing but the definition of the true Sky-God concept, that is, the ancient Turanian deities of Sky, Sky-God, Sun and Moon which are all eternal and will last forever.   

 The term "ETERNAL", when rearranged letter-by-letter as "AL-TENRE" and read as in Turkish, is the restructured and disguised form of the Turkish word "AL TANRI" (KIZIL TANRI) meaning "RED-GOD" or "GOLDEN GOD".  This ancient Turanian name refers to the Sun, that is, AL-TANRI which is red and golden, the Moon, that is, ALA-TANRI which is golden in its full-moon state, and the universal creator Sky-God, that is, ALA-TANRI (ÂLÂ TANRI) meaning the "Supreme God of all". The presence of the Turkish expression "AL TANRI" in the word "ETERNAL" is an unquestionable proof that the original name of the city of "ROME" was a Turkish name such as "AL TANRI" or a similar expression describing the Sky God of the Turanians – but later converted to the word "ETERNAL".  In other words, this was an usurpation of a newly established Turanian city with a Turanian name. Its Turkic name described the name of the eternal god of Turanians.  The Turkish name AL TANRI is like the descriptive Turkish expressions "ALGON ALMA" or "KIZIL ALMA" that I talked about in PART-1 of this paper.  
The English word "CITY" in the name "The Eternal City" represents an overgrown village, that is, "KÖY" in Turkish. "The Eternal City" was initially a "village". With this addition to the name, the Turkish source phrase used for the name becomes "AL TANRI KÖYÜ"  meaning "The Village of Red God" or "The Village of Golden God".

This new Etruscan city that was later called Roma by the invading Romans, still had to have a godly name as that was the tradition of Turanians at the time of its founding.  Similar to the city name so-called "ALBA LONGA", that is, "ALGUN ALMA" or "KIZIL ALMA", the new city had to have a similar godly name as well.  So a Turanian name like "ALTANRI KÖYÜ" (The Eternal City) was given to it.  When the Romans took the city, they changed its name to ROMA but they retained the original Etruscan godly name "ALTANRI KÖYÜ" in complete secrecy.  The fact that the original name of the city was in Turkish must have been the reason why it was forbidden to pronounce its original name aloud.  If anyone said this name aloud, he/she would be killed. That is why even the Pontifex Maximus, Chief priest, could not pronounce the sacred name loudly. It is amazing what a precarious position an act of thievery puts people into. Romans stole a city which did not belong to them in the first place, and a supreme Turanian civilization that built this city, but after that they could not even say its original name aloud because it was in Turkish. They had to invent the name "ROMA" for this stolen city which identified it with Gypsy Romans. The new name "ROMA" was like a new coat of "paint" the car thieves put on a stolen car in order to comouflage their illegal possession.

>From the above reference and related to the word "eternal", there is the Latin words "AETERNUS" and "AETERNUM" meaning "eternal, immortal, everlasting, forever". [10]

This word AETERNUM, when rearranged as "TANREUEM", where U=Y, is the restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TANRIYUM" meaning "I am God". The true GOD (TANRI) of ancient Turanians was indeed "eternal" and still is, that is, "forever". Even this "Latin" word AETERNUM verifies the fact that the original name of "ROMA" was a sacred name in Turkish.

Regarding the founding of the city of ROME, in the book entitled "The Roman Mind at Work" by Paul MacKendrick, the Professor of Classics in the University of Wisconsin, he writes, (referring to LIVY: From the Founding of the City, Preface, 6-11): [11]

"Rome’s foundation legend, which are epic poetry rather than sound factual documents, I intend neither to affirm nor to deny.  Tales of ancient times have the special privilege of ennobling the origins of cities by mingling the human with the divine, and if any people has the right to deify its beginnings and make the gods responsible for them, the Roman people are so famous in war that when they claim Mars as their founder’s father and their own, the nations of the earth should acquiesce as gracefully as they acquiesce in Roman rule."

First of all this reference verifies what I have been saying, that is, the Turanians deified their cities by giving them names composed after the name of their Sky-God. Above I have shown that the so-called "Eternal City" attribution given to the city of ROMA was indeed God’s name, that is, "AL TANRI" which was in pure Turkish using the Turkish words AL and TANRI. I have no quarrel with Livy’s saying that Romans had the right to deify their cities, only he forgets to tell us that all that deification was done in Turkish converted into a bogus language that was manufactured from Turkish by the Romans. That is the big question to be answered by the European scholars! What I am explaining to you here is the usurpation of the entire Turanian civilization expressed in Turkish but deceptively attributed to some wanderer peoples who had nothing to do with that culture except for the stealing part - which they did with great skill. This fact has never been brought to daylight before until now and by me.

In the above reference by Stewart Perowne, the date of April 21st is mentioned as a day of celebrations of the birth of the city of Rome.  The choice of April 21st is not coincidental. This date is one month later than the March 21st which is the day of the so-called "summer equinox". This is an act of, so-called ‘creative borrowing’ by the European writers, stealing an existing ancient Turanian New Years day celebration (March 21st) in the Spring and moving it one month later and then calling it their own.  At this date, day-by-day, the sun starts appearing in the northern hemisphere more and more. March 21st is also called "ERGENEKON" ("ERGEN GUN) meaning "young sun, new sun". and also "NEWRUZ" where R is an upshift from letter Q and W is YU, which then becomes "NEUUQUZ"  which is an anagram of Turkish expression "YENI OQUS"  (YENI OGÖZ, YENI OGUZ) referring to the newness of the Sun.  Of course this whole affair is nothing but an obliteration of an ancient Turanian tradition.

Here I want to dwell on the term "equinox" which is given in Latin as "AEQUINOCTIUM" meaning "day and night are equal". [12]

When the Latin word AEQUINOCTIUM is rearranged letter-by-letter as "QUN-CITE-AINOUM", it reveals itself as the restructured, altered and disguised form of the Turkish expressin "GÜN GICE AYNIYUM" meaning "day and night are the same". In this anagram, Turkish GUN means "day", GICE (GECE) means "night" and AYNIYUM means "I am the same". So this Latin word too is a testament of the stolen Turkish language and civilization during the days of so-called "Romans".

The above reference also assuredly states that the "powerful" Romans were uncomfortable about not having an "august" ancestry. Romans feeling so low about their ancestry is quite understandable although the western writers do not dwell on it. Romans had no nobility because their ancestry was nothing but "wandering gypsies", just like the ancient Greeks and the Babylonians were wandering gypsies who had stolen everything from the native Turanians and called what they stole as their own culture. With the sneaky anagrammatising technique which they used to convert Turkish words and phrases as broken up (kirik, girik) words for themselves, they could instantly alter the civilization and the language of Turanians and then call the transfered item whatever they wanted – e.g., Roman, Greek, Babylonian, etc. That was the most perfect stealing technique ever invented. The admirers of the so-called Greco-Roman "civilization" keep referring to this invisible transference of Turanian civilization as the Greek, Roman and Semitic "genius".  In one sense, they are right because it was a genius stealing act – however it was still an act of "stealing", and stealing from a superior civilization.

The missing "AUGUST" ancestry that the Romans wanted to have was the Turanian "OGUZ-ATA" ancestry, that is, the "OGUZ ATA" Sky-God concept that the wanderers used every trick to destroy since the time of the Tur/Turk Sumerian and Masarian peoples.

In the above reference we are also presented with the names of Terracina, Veii, and Alba Longa.  Before we proceed further, we should dwell on the name TERRACINA for understanding its ancient identity. From Wikipedia encyclopedia, at url:, we have the following information about  the town of TERRACINA.
"Terracina: Terracina is a comune and episcopal see of the province of Latina - (until 1934 of the province of Rome), Italy, 76 km SE of Rome by rail (56 km by the Via Appia).

Terracina appears in ancient sources with two names: the Latin Tarracina and the Volscian Anxur (Plin. NH 3.59: "lingua Volscorum Anxur dictum"). The latter is the names of Jupiter himself as a youth (Iuppiter Anxur or Anxurus), and was the tutelary god of the city, venerated on the Mons Neptunius (current Monte S. Angelo), where a temple dedicated to him still exists. The name Tarracina has been instead pointed out variously as pre-Indo-European origin, or as Etruscan (Tarchna or Tarchuna, the same of Tarquinii family): in this view, it would precede the Volscian conquest."

Polat Kaya:  Embedded in the name of Terracina (Tarracina) are two Turkish expressions related to the name:

1.  Terracina, when rearranged letter-by-letter as "TARCAN-ERI", is a rearranged and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TARKAN ERI" which in one meaning means "The Tarkan people" (Etruscan people, Turk people), and in the other, it is "TARKAN yERI" meaning "the land of TARKANS" or "the land of Etruscans" or "the land of Turks". This is clearly identified in the above reference. The name TARKAN (TARQUIN) was the names of the Etruscan kings who built and ruled The Eternal City, that is, the "ALTANRI KÖYÜ", later altered to "ROMA", for its first hundred years before the RUMS or ROMANS stole the city. This is also mentioned in above reference. Thus Rome was founded and ruled by Turanian Tur/Turk peoples who inhabiyed the ancient land of "ITALIA" during the time of Etruscans before it was stolen by the wanderers. The name TARKAN is a Turkish male name that is widely used among the Turkish peoples to present times.    

2, Terracina, when rearranged as "CAE-TANRI-R", is a rearranged form of the Turkish expression "GÖY-TANRI-ER"  meaning "Sky-God Man" referring to both the name of the Turanian Sky-God and the people following that God concept, and also "GÖY-TANRI-YER" (TANRI YERI) meaning "the land of Sky God" which of course refers to TERRACINA as the land of the ancient Turanian Sky-God believing people. Naming the capital towns after the name of the Sky-God is an ancient Turanian tradition.

On the other hand the name VOLSCIAN in VOLSCIAN ANXUR, where V is Y, is the disguised form of the Turkish word "YOLCILER" meaning "the wanderers" in one hand and also "YELCILER" in the other meaning "the wind worshippers" - both of which describes the wandering gypsies.  The Turkish word "YOL" means "road", AN is an ancient plurality suffix of Turkish corresponding to present "LER, LAR", YOLCULAR (VOLSCIAN) means "those who are on the road going from place to place", YEL means "wind", YELCILER means "those who worship the wind". Evidently it was the wind-believing wanderers who usurped the ancient Turanian city of "ALTANRI" and renamed it as "ROMA".

The names TARCHNA, TARCHUNA or TARQUIN of Etruscan kings are definitely variations of the ancient Turkish title of TARKAN that ancient Turkish kings of Central Asia took.  This title was second to the title of HAKAN.  [13]

In the above reference, the name JUPITER is mentioned. This name was equivalent to the so-called "Greek" name "ZEUS".  In one sense, ZEUS was the god of storm.  I have written a whole essay about the name "ZEUS" which can be found in the Polat Kaya Yahoo Library.

The name JUPITER, in its simplest form is a camouflaged form of the Turkish expression "CÖY-PETER" (GÖY PEDER, GÖK ATA) meaning "The Sky Father". "CÖY-PETER" is in the Turkish dialect that the Turkish people around the Black Sea region speak.  In the Turksh dialect of this region, they pronounce Turkish letter "G" as Turkish letter "C" as in letter "J" of English. Thus Turkish "GÖY" (GÖK" meaning "sky") becomes "CÖY" as pronounced in the "JU" of the name "JUPITER". The ancient word "PEDER" (PETER) meaning "father" has also been used widely in Turkish for a long time. Thus the Turkish "CÖY-PEDER" becomes "JUPITER".  

We must also note that, during the Roman times, there was no letter "J", It was the letter "I" used in place of letters I, Y, and J. For example in the Latin dictionary there is no entry under the letter "J".  The letter "J" is a later concoction to be used for further deceptions of stealing from the Turkish language. The Latin dictionary gives the name of the supreme god of Romans as "IUPPITER" rather than "JUPITER". [14]

The linguistic claim that PITER (PETER, PEDER, PATRE, PADRE) is Indo-European in origin is also bogus. The word "PETER" is the distorted form of the Turkish word "APATIR" (APADIR) meaning "he is father" where Turkish "APA" means "father" and DIR is the Turkish suffix DIR, Dur, TIR, TUR, DI, TI meaning "it is".  Thus this so-called "Indo-European" word is also a distorted Turkish expression altered by way of anagrammatizing.  

Similarly, the word "MOTHER" (MADRE) is also a distorted form of the Turkish word "ANADIR" (ANATIR) meaning "it is mother"  The letter "N" in Turkish "ANADIR" has been alphabetically down-shifted to "M" in "MOTHER". The root Turkish words APA (ATA) meaning "father" and "ANA" meaning "mother" have been wrapped with other Turkish suffixes and/or words in order to make  the Turkish words unrecognizable. Linguistic wrapping of root Turkish words with other words is one of the camouflaging tricks used in manufacturing words for the so-called "Indo-European" languages - from Turkish. The name "JUPITER has additional meanings embedded in its structure.    

The Roman god Jupiter was equivalent to the Greek Zeus who was the storm god in one of his godly functions.  In this context, when we rearrange the name IUPITER as "PER-TIPI-U", it is the Turkish expression "BIR TIPI O" meaning "it is one storm".  Thus in this format Jupiter is described by this Turkish expression as a "storm god". Turkish word TIPI means "storm", BIR means "one", and U/O means "it is" or he/she/it as the personal pronoun for third person singular and "that" as a demonstrative pronoun.

In another meaning of JUPITER (IUPITER), it is described as the supreme sky god. In this context, when we rearrange the name IUPITER as "TIPI–ER-U", it is a form of the Turkish expression "TEPE ER O" meaning "he is the top most man" referring to the supreme sky-god above. Turkish word TEPE means "head, top of anything, hill, top of the mountain, sky with meaning of "above or zenith". The word "ZENITH" is an anagram of the Turkish expression "EN ÜST" meaning "very top".

Furthermore, when rearranged as "ER-TIPI-U", it is a form of the Turkish expression "ER TEPE O" meaning "it is the head of man". In this format it is describing the human head as equivalent to God. The human head is indeed a godly being as it also creates abstract thoughts and converts them to voice, speech, language, singing, crying, writing, two and three dimentional monuments, etc. Thus the human head is also a creator godly being. That is why human being is sacred and should not be killed.

Alternatively the name IUPITER, when rearranged as "R-TIPE-UI", reveals itself as the Turkish expression "ER TEPE ÖY" (ER BAS ÖY) meaning "Man’s head house", thus referring to the godly creative organ of "head".     

Finally, when we rearrange the name IUPITER as "PII-UT-ER", it reveals itself as Turkish "BEI UT ER" (BEY OT/OD ER) meaning "Lord Fire man" referring to the Sun,  or "BEI UT ER" (BEY UT ER), meaning "Lord Bull Man".  This again refers to the sky deities Sun and Moon of the ancient Turanians.

The Turkish word "UT" (also in the forms of OT and OD) means "fire"; but in the form "UT", it also means "cattle" and in the form "UT ER" means "Bull".  Thus all of this refers to the name OGUZ" by using different expressions in Turkish.     

Finally, there is one more aspect of the name IUPITER that makes it a "god’. The name IUPITER, in the form of "U-PI-TEIR", is the Turkish saying of "O BEY DEYIR" meaning "That Lord  speaks" which refers to the human ‘head" and the "mouth" which does the "thinking and speaking" respectively.  Thus the name IUPITER is another way of describing the  "AGUZ" "meaning "mouth", "word", "speech" and "language" in Turkish. This is just like the Turkish OGUZ and AGUZ combination.


Returning back to the three names given in the above reference, that is TERRACINA, VEII and ALBA LONGA we find that they are all named after the Turanian Sky deities.

The name VEII was an old town in Etruria. [15].  Thus the town was an Etruscan town and it should carry the name of of their sky deities.  

VEII when rearranged as "EI-VI" where V=U, is the restructured form of the Turkish name "AI UI" (AY ÖY, AY EVI) meaning "house of moon". Thus the old name of the city was in Turkish, but somehow someone who did not like seeing the Turkish names around sneakily changed the name to VEII.

Thus the three names of the Etrurian towns VEII (AY ÖYÜ), ALBA LONGA (ALGUN ALBA/ALMA) and TERRACINA ("GÖY-TANRI-YER") meaning "the land of Sky God" were all named after the ancient Turanian deities.

After having noted this background information about the name TERRACINA, VEII and ALBA LONGA, we now return back to the writings of Stewart Perowne. He continues,  [16] :

"Thus it came about that the Romans sought their spiritual comfort elsewhere.  First, in their national legends, and that brings us back to Aeneas. The origin of Rome are unexiciting but undisputed by practical necessity.  In the eighth century BC the chief power in northern Italy was the race we know as the Etruscans.  We still do not know where they came from, nor, though we admire their arts, can we yet read their language.  The river Tiber formed a boundary south of which Latin shepherds and herdsmen lived in humble settlements.  The lowest point at which the Tiber was fordable (and the ford itself therefore a danger for the Latins) was also the first place inland at which the river’s southern bank is rendered defensible by two hills, each about 50 meters above sea level, namely the Palatine and the Capitol, as they were afterwards to be known.  So it was on these two knolls that Rome came into beginning.  Did Romulus exist?  He may well have done, even if the wolf is mythical.  The story that Cyrus the Persian was suckled by a bitch is no proof that he never lived.  So how does AENEAS come in?  The answer is the rather suprising one that over a very large part of Italy, that is Naples southwards, the Greeks had got there long before the Romans. At a time when the inhabitants of Latium were rude goatherds and farmers, standing in awe of their mysterious, cruel but undoubtedly gifted Etruscan neighbours, the Greeks had established colonies imbubed with their own civilization on many a smiling site in the south. Clearly therefore, if Rome was to have a respectible ancestry, a Trojan one would be smartest, because whoever may have won the Trojan War, it was obvious that Troy must have been there before the Greeks attacked it, or there would have been no war. (We now know that it was there a very, very long time before.)

So Aeneas, the dutiful son, the single-hearted soldier, this hero-figure becomes the founder of Rome. He is entertained by a shepherd on the Palatine. The shepherd is Evander, himself of Trojan origin. Thus is Rome’s pedigree fabricated and authenticated."  [17]

[Note: highlights in the above reference are mine.]

Polat Kaya:  What is understood from this reference is that the Romans who usurped "Rome" from the native Turanians, also had to fabricate a mythology in order to usurp an ancient Turanian noble name "AY-HAN", (one of the six sons of Oguz-Kagan) and represent it by another Turkic name "AENEAS" (from Turkish "AE-EN-AS" meaning "One/peerless AY-HAN (Moon-Lord)", to fabricate a noble founder of Rome so that the Romans could have noble ancestry.

As the above reference admits, this was done to overcome the Romans lack of nobility in their ancestors. This shows that weaving tall tales into "mythology" is an effective way of stealing and changing the history and identity of peoples.  It was that simple!  The ancient wanderers have developed this technique to its zenith level. The Babylonians did it, the Greeks did it and so did the Romans. Curiously, the noble prince in the fabricated Roman mythology was a Turanan prince from Troy – that is, TUR-OY meaning "Home of Turs".

The reference states that when Aeneas arrived in Italy he was greeted and hosted by a good man who was also a Trojan.  His name is said to be EVANDER.  The Greek form of the name EVANDER is given as EUANDROS meaning "abounding in good or brave man, good man".  [18]

When the name EUANDROS is rearranged letter-by-letter as "DANRE OUS", it becomes clear that the name is a stolen Turkish expression spelling out the name of ancient Turanian Sky-Father-God "DANRI OUS" (TANRI OGUZ) himself.  This clearly brings to forefront the following meanings:

a) The people of ancient Italia were Tur/Turk/Oguz people who welcomed the Trojan AENEAS (AY HAN) and provided him all the hospitality he needed as ‘hospitality" is a tradition of Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples wherever they are and irrespective of whom they are hosting.

b) AENEAS was the Turanian people’s Sky-Deity AY-HAN, who was one of the six sons of the Sky GOD OGUZ KAGAN (HAKAN).  When the AY-HAN (i.e., the Moon) was over Italia, he was met with the Sky-Father-God Tanri Oguz himself who guided his son AY-HAN in his way to continue its mission around the Earth. Thus this expression fulfills the mythologic aspect of the story as well.  Its most important aspect is that it uses the Turkish words DANRI (TANRI) and OUS (OGUZ) which verify the presence of Turkish speaking Turanians in ancient Italia at the time of Trojan wars.

The other five sons of Oguz Kagan were: GÜN-HAN (Sun Lord), YILDIZ-HAN (Star Lord), GÖK-HAN (Sky-Lord), DAG-HAN (Mountain Lord) and DENIZ HAN (Sea Lord). The Greeks, the Romans, the Europeans, Semitics and most likely others too stole and camouflaged all of these Turkish deity concepts and presented the acts of stealing in terms of tall-tales, that is, the so-called "mythology".

Alternatively, when the EUANDROS is rearranged letter-by-letter as "EU-ANDOR-S", it is the Hellenized form of the Turkish expression "EYU HANDUR" (IYI HANDIR) meaning "He is good lord" or "he is good man".  This meaning in Turkish agrees perfectly with the given meaning attributed to the word EUANDROS.  This again shows that its source was Turkish.  This we see in the case of EVANDER also.

The name EVANDER, in which V is a U or Y, when shown as "EU-ANDER", it is the Anglicized form of the Turkish expression "EYU HANDIR" meaning "He is good lord".  Thus the name is again from a Turkish source.

All of this clearly demonstrates that the ancient Turanian world civilization has been subjected to an act of unimaginable fraud and embezzlement in which the Turanian language, religion, names, culture, traditions, laws (töre) and everything else including the kitchen sink (as they say) have been deliberately stolen by a group of extremely secretive wanderers.  In order to achieve this peerless theft, they used the simple technique of anagrammatizing the Turkish words, expressions, names, etc. to come up with multiple number of artificially manufactured "languages" and countless number of tall-tale stories in riddle forms to cover up their secret actions. These past acts of fraud have been disguised from the eyes of the world population throughout history.


Greek mythological tales are tall tales made up from the legends of ancient Turanians. Such tall tales always targeted the ancient Turanians as their selected victims. Mythological stories are concoctions designed to bring the usurper to the forefront as the "civilization giver", while denying the identity and existence in history of the real civilization givers, that is, the ancient Turanians. For example, HOMER (from Turkish OMAR, OMER) was not a Greek as his name clearly identifies, but he and his works were stolen and presented as "Greek" most likely after the conquests of Anatolia by Alexander the Great. A similar action was done by the Semitic Babylonians in the case of Sumerian BILGAMESH which was presented falsely as "GILGAMESH" thus alienating it from the Turkish speaking Turanians.

The mythological name ROMULUS was part of a fictional tale. The name ROMULUS, on the face of its appearance implies that it is Greek. This name ROMULUS in the form "ROM ULUS" is a Turkish expression meaning "the Greek nation" impliying that ROMULUS was Greek.  But the expression is in Turkish indicating that the name was actually in Turkish, and was altered from Turkish, and most likely the legend was stolen by way of altering its original form. The Turkish word RUM means "Greek" and "ULUS" means "nation". Hopefully in a separate article we will discuss the Romulus and Remus story.

The Greeks were wandering GRAECI (meaning "Greek"  [19]) from Turkish "GARACI" (çingene, gezginci) meaning "wandering gypsy" belonging to no particular place.  They were "wind" believers just like the other wandering gypsies.

Regarding Romulus, in the book entitled "The Roman Mind at Work" by Paul MacKendrick writes, (referring to EUTROPIUS: Digest of Roman History, I, 1-4):  [20]

"The Roman Empire, virtually the humblest in its origins, the greatest in its world-wide expansions, that human memory can recall, began with ROMULUS, son of Rhea Silvia, a Vestal Virgin, and, allegedly, of Mars.  He and his brother REMUS were twins. He grew up among sheperds, as a highwayman;  at eighteen he founded a primitive city on the Palatine Hill, on April 21, in the third year of the Sixth Olympiad; 394 years - striking an average between upper and lower traditional dates- after the fall of Troy [753 B. C.}"

Polat Kaya:  The statement that Roman Empire began with ROMULUS  is pure fiction having no validity whatsoever. The EUTROPIUS continues:  

"Since he and his people had no wives, he invited the tribes nearest rome to a festival, and carried off their daughters.  The injustice of this act moved the tribes to war, but he beat them ... When after a sudden storm he disappeared."

This clearly identifies that they are talking about their beliefs of the "wind god" who had no wife or wives. The wind elopes with every thing that it comes across and takes it away with itself. In other words, it is a cheater, a rougue mythological concept for a god, and he disappears after a "storm" and suppesedly goes to heaven which is also true because wind is a phenomenon of air movements which takes place in the sky (i.e., heaven). There is the Turkish word "HAVA" meaning "sky, heaven, air".  The word "HEAVEN is nothing but the distorted form of the Turkish word "HAVA-HAN" (GÖK HAN). The wind is not visible, but lets itself be felt by being "pushy", it is agrressive and howling all the time when it is around, it is confusing and mixing things into each other, and it sets things one against the other - as is done by its believers.  It is not restive or peaceful.  It comes and goes as it pleases, and is not trustable. Such has become the source of culture for the ancient wind believers.

On the other hand, the name ROMULUS in the form of "MOR ULUS" meaning "purple nation" represents Sun and Moon believing Turanians who also went to ancient Italia and became the native peoples of the area.  They are identified by the Turanian peoples such as Etruscans, Trojans, Albans, Oscans, and others who not only believed and worshipped the red and golden sun (AL-GÜN, KIZIL GÜN, MOR GÜN) but also wore the royal colors of ‘crimson-red’ (AL, KIRMIZI, KAN rengi) and ‘purple’ (MOR) colours to distinguish themselves in many ways. As believers of SUN, they were fair people, dependable, peaceful, trustable, and always there to help guide people in their ways everywhere without making any distinction between them.  This concept had become the traditions of the Sun-Moon worshipping Turanians.

The concept of "MOR ULUS" by the Turanians also appears as another historical empire in Europe in the recent times under the name  "MOOR EMPIRE" which lasted some 700 years in Spain. This name "MOOR" is very much reminiscent of the ancient Turkic name of "MOR-ULUS" in ancient Italia. At the west, the sun takes the "red" (AL) and "purple" (MOR) colors as it sets.  In the western world, the word MOR in the form of MAR has been used as a replacement of the name TUR in order to obliterate the name TUR.

Stealing the name "MOR-ULUS" into "ROM-ULUS" constitutes no challenge to the Greek thinker as one is the reversal of the other. After all they had already stolen the whole Turkish language in manufacturing a Greek language in the same way. Hence they were expert manipulators of the Turkish language. In doing that, however, they had to generate tall tales, so-called "Greek mythology", in order to cover up their ignoble activities.

The author of the above reference, Stewart Perowne, states that:

"..... The answer is the rather suprising one that over a very large part of Italy, that is Naples southwards, the Greeks had got there long before the Romans. At a time when the inhabitants of Latium were rude goatherds and farmers, standing in awe of their mysterious, cruel but undoubtedly gifted Etruscan neighbours, the   Greeks had established colonies imbubed with their own civilization on many a smiling site in the south."

It is difficult to understand the reasoning of the author when he colors the native Etruscan people of "LATIUM" as "rude goatherds and farmers" while he elavates the "Greeks". He seems to conveniently forget that those "Greeks" and "Romans" got everything from those "rude goatherds and farmers" and "cruel" Etruscans.  It seems that the author has a "grudge" or "hatred" against the Etruscans and because of that, he bad-mouths them. Badmouthing is a characteristic of those who feel insecure and inadequate in front of those who are noble and superior. One wonders how the author knew that the gifted Etruscans were "cruel".  It is ironic that the author somehow knows that the Etruscans were "cruel" but does not know who the Etruscans were.  Of course this is complete sophistry, that is, dishonest in essence but appearing convincing, because probably many European "scholars" know perfectly well that the Etruscans were Turanians and Turkic and that their language was Turanian Turkish.

The Greeks had already invaded the southern part of "Italy" by their deceptive "salesmanship" activities designed for colonization. This is a sinister technique of infiltration into another group’s country under the pretense of doing commercial activities, as the above reference indicates by saying; "that over a very large part of Italy, that is Naples southwards, the Greeks had got there long before the Romans."  

This is interesting because it means that neither the Greeks nor the later coming "Romans" were the native people of Italia.  The real native peoples of Italia were the Turanians from ALTAI, that is, Etruscans, Pelasgians, Trojans and other Turanians who had been there long before the arrival of the Greeks and Romans. But the newly arriving wanderers had the tradition of usurping and altering the language and the religion of the natives and also the names of the landmarks wherever they went.  Hence the Greek had already started changing the language and the identity of the native peoples in southern Italia whose control they took over by deceptive political maneuvers. When the so-called "ROMANS", that is, another group of wanderers, came to Italy and took over the power of "ROMA", they also did what they were skillful at doing, that is, stealing the civilization of the native Turanians.  Being a "wanderer" group originally, they could not help feeling low on not having a noble ancestry although they had captured the ruling power of the country.

In the book entitled "The Roman Mind at Work" by Professor Paul MacKendrick writes:  [21]

"And behind the façade we can glimpse the real Roman character:  skeptical, pessimistic, precise, practical; superstitious, quarrelsome, guileful, bellicose.  Above all, to Cicero and Livy this was not ancient history."

The above reference also mentions the name of ROMULUS as the founder of the city of ROMA.  Of course, this is no more than fiction.

Werner Keller writes in the "foreword" section of his book the following:   [22]

"NO OTHER EUROPEAN PEOPLE HAS BEEN AS NEGLECTED AS THE ETRUSCANS, and the legacy of no other group has been so systematically destroyed.  It is as though posterity had conspired to erase every trace of a nation whose pioneer activity constituted the first major chapter in the history of the west. There has been no real change in this attitute even though excavations have, since the last century, brought to light an amazing quantity of discoveries. If one inquires when Rome was founded, the answer generally given is a date – 753 B.C. – that is wrong and long superseded, but nevertheless still recorded in every work of reference and school book.  The question of who founded the city is also given an incorrect answer, namely, Romulus, just as Roman schoolboys learned two thousand years ago.

And yet it is now reasonably certain that it was an Etruscan king called Tarquinius Priscus who founded Rome in about 575 B.C. This historical fact has remained largely unknown to the public.  And it is not the only one, for the Etruscan foundation and development of the city on the Tiber that subsequently became Rome is only one of the many admirable achievements of this remarkable people. Long before Rome existed, they had already established an empire on Italian soil with big cities, industry, arts and crafts, and world wide trade.  But all this the general public has been told almost nothing.  Anyone who wants to find out about this people is in for a disappointment."

Werner Keller clearly shows that ROMULUS, that is, "RUM ULUS" had no part in the foundation of the city of ROMA.  They only usurped the city by trickery. It was the "MOR ULUS" (i.e., Purple Nation), that is, the Turanians that had built the city.

In the above reference Stewart Perowne also says:

"In the eight century BC the chief power in northern Italy was the race we know as the Etruscans. We still do not know where they came from, nor, though we admire their arts, can we yet read their language."

Such pronouncements also are not truthful statements. They are blatant deceptions and sophistry! The Europeans got all of their civilization from Etruscans and the Pelasgians by attending their schools, yet they keep saying that they do not know who the Etruscans and Pelasgians  were.  This is dishonesty at its zenith.

Peter Croft, in his book writes:  [23]

"The Romans’ firm belief that they were of Trojan origin was based on the myth of Aeneas, the son of an otherwise obscure Trojan prince, Anchises, and the goddess of love, Venus.  Such unions were not unknown in the histories of aristocratic families, and the Julians, represented by such men of distinction as Julius Caesar and his great-nephew Augustus, claimed that their gens or clan was descended directly  from Aeneas himself. In this fresco from Rome’s Palazzo Farnese, the consummation of Venus’s love for Anchises is vividly portrayed by Caracci and neatly expressed in the words of the poet Virgil – genus unde Latinum—"the origines of the Romans".

The ruling "Romans" were not "Trojan" in origin!.  On the contrary they were "wanderers, most likely of "RUM" origin, that is, they were "gypsy wanderers". But the native people of Rome and its surrounding area and the rest of the ancient "Italia" were Turanians. Similarly Trojans were also Turanian Tur/Turk peoples of Anatolia and were from ALTAI region of Central Asia. That is why their country was called "Asia Minor".  It is said that even Trojans were present and had helped in building the ancient city so-called "ROMA".  Thus the Romans, by inventing a mythology to claim a "Trojan" ancestry were actually playing puns on words.  As the "gypsy" rulers of Rome, and later on of Italia, they could readily claim that they were "Troyans" without appearing as liars – because most of the people that they were ruling were assimilated Turanians. But manufacturing a mythological AENEAS story made their claim appear legitimate. There is another parallel situation to this where the "wanderers" changed the name of ancient MASAR (MISIR) to "EGYPT" – thus claiming it as if it was a "Gypsy" state.

In the above cited paragraph, the expression "genus unde Latinum" is described as meaning "the origines of the Romans".  This expression is one that appears in the epic story "The Aeneid" by Virgil.  But it must be noted that this expression does not mention "Romans".  It mentions the so-called "Latinium" people. After all the name "ROMAN" not only does not have any linguistic relation with the name "LATINUM", but also, as people, "Romans" did not have any ethnic relation to the LATIUM or LATINUM people.  Most likely, the Romans had an ethnic relation with the RUMS, that is, the Greeks.  Hence the terms "Romans" and "Latins" did not necessarily represent the same people.  The above cited paragraph tells us one thing for sure and that is, the so-called "Romans" usurped the identity of the people called "LATINUM" who were the "noble" people while the "Romans" were the "Gypsies".  After all it was the "ROMANS" who were trying to find a noble ancestry for themselves.

The names LATINUM, LATIUM and ITALIA are all linguistically related to each other.

LATIUM, when rearranged as "ILTAUM" or "ALTIUM", is the restructured and disguised form of the Turkish word "ALTAYUM"  meaning "I am Altai" referring to the ALTAI mountains region of Central Asia which is the homelands of the Tur/Turk peoples.

Similarly, the name ITALIA, when rearranged as "ALTAI-I", is the restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "ALTAY ÖY" meaning "Altai home" which again refers to the Altai region of Central Asia. Since the land of "ITALIA" is an anagram of the Turkish expression "ALTAI HOME", then this also indicates that the ancient inhabitants of that home-land were ALTAI people, that is, they were TUR/TURK/OGUZ peoples.  They were definitely not the wandering "ROMANS" or the "RUMS" i.e., the Greek who came there later.

So the word LATINUM, as it appears in Virgil’s book, was a made up word using the Turkish word "ALTAI" plus the Turkish verbal suffix UM for first person singular meaning "I am" all put together and restructured as LATINUM meaning in one hand "I am Altaian" (I am from Altai", and in the other "I am Latin".

Again it is clear that the wanderer groups habitually turned the tables around and usurped the identity of the Turanian Tur/Turk peoples in an altered format and declared themselves in that new name. This was nothing less than usurping the identity of Altaian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples – also known as "identity theft".  This kind of behaviour has been demonstrated by the wanderer groups throughout history. Such behaviour is not only aimed at obliterating the people of Turanians from history, but also at stealing and transferring their identity and civilization over to the Gypsies. This is done so easily and readily by way of restructuring the names and identities of the Turanian peoples and by forcing them to speak a manufactured language that is really made up from the Turkish language. Then when a linguistic self serving "authority" (i.e., scholars, historians, linguists etc) validifies the presented pseudo linguistic state as real, all the stones find their intended places.  

>From url:, we have the expression in Latin from Virgil’s Book :

"genus unde Latinum Albanique patres atque altae moenia Romae."

First we have "genus unde Latinum" supposedly meaning "the origines of the Romans", or more correctly, "the origines of the Latins". We also have the expression "Albanique patres" which means "Albanian fathers". Thus the meaning of these two expressions put together becomes clearly "The origines of the Latins is Albanian fathers". In this expression the term "Albanique patres" refers to the "ALBAN FATHERS" of ALBA LONGA, LAURENTUM, LATIUM, LAVINIUM and of course the Etruscans. That is all together "AL" believing Turanians.

The expression "GENUS UNDE LATINUM", when rearranged letter-by-letter as "ALTI-UUDEN-GENUS-MN" and read as in Turkish, it reveals itself as a restructured form of the Turkish expression "ALTAY ÖYDEN CANUZ" meaning "we are people from ALTAI Home" which again identifies the "LATINUM people as people from ALTAI region of Central Asia, that is, Turkish spaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Even the name ETRUSK, when rearranged as "TURKSE" and read as in Turkish clearly states that its origin is the Turkish word "TURKSE" (TURKCE), that is, "Turkish" speaking people.  

Similarly, the expression "Albanique Patres" can readily be shown to be from Turkish:

"ALBAN-QEI-AP-TURES" (ALBAN KÖY APA-TURUZ) meaning "we are Tur fathers of ALBAN village";

Thus this describes the so-called LATINUM peoples as being from ALBAN village, and thus as being the followers of the ancient Turanian Red/Golden Sky-Father religion.  The term ALBAN, even in the form of "AL BAN" (AL BEN) means "I am red" which again indicates their Red (Golden) Sky-God beliefs. The "AENEAS" mythology by the Romans was manufactured to Romanize the native Turanians into a totally different identity.

In Cassell’s Latin-English Dictionary, defines the words ALBANUS, ALBANUM, ALBENSES and ALBENSIS as the "people of Latium", that is, the people of ALBA LONGA.   [24]

These words ALBANUS, ALBENSES and ALBENSIS are the variations of the Turkish word "ALBENIZ" (AL BENIZ) meaning "Red faced". Turkish word BENIZ means "the color of the face". Another Turkish expression is "AL BASH" (KIZIL BASH) meaning  "Red Head" referring to those who wear "red" to their heads to indicate that they are the followers of the "AL TANRI", the SUN.  Similarly if we take the Latin word ALBANUM as a Turkish word, this word in the form "AL BANUM" (AL BENUM) means "I am red". In old times some of these believers also painted their faces with red pigment again to indicate that they are the followers of the "AL TANRI", that is, the "SUN". Evidently the LATIUM of ALBA LONGANS were such "AL TANRI" believing peoples.

Here we should also mention the Etruscan word LAR or LARES meaning "LORD", found as a first name and also the name of tutelary (guardian) god of Etruscans.  It is also known as the God of the hearth (ocak, atesh in Turkish).  Of course this signifies nothing but the Sun-God for the Etruscans.  The word LAR is a distorted form of the Turkish phrase "AL AR" (AL ER) meaning "The Red Man" and similarly LARES is the Turkish "AL ER AS" (AL AS ER) meaning "Red Peerless Man" which describes the Turanian Sky God deities.

Such traditions also exist among the North and South American native peoples. For example, the so-called "ALGONQUIAN RED INDIANS" of North America also painted their faces and shirts in red. ALGONQUIANS also show their ancient "SUN" believing religion by wearing a Sun symbol on their heads.   See url:
ALGON (AL GÜN, KIZIL GÜN) in Turkish means "Red Sun" or "Golden Sun".

The Sun believing Inca peoples of Peru in South America, also wear crimson-red colored dresses and red head-dresses during their religious ceremonies.  Additionally Inca priests also wear the Purple coloured garments during their religious ceremonies. These are not coincidences but due to ancient Turanian religious beliefs that had spread all over the world.

The so-called "Latin" expression "GENUS UNDE LATINUM" has another Turkish expression embedded in it which is related to the town of "ALBA LONGA" and later to the "Eternal" city of "ROMA".  When this expression is rearranged letter-by-letter as "GUNESDEN-ALTIN-UUM", it is the Turkish expression "GÜNESDEN ALTIN ÖYÜM" meaning "I am the Golden Home of sun" which describes the original town ALBA LONGA that the ALTAI peoples built. I have already shown that ALBA LONGA in the form "ALGON ALMA" meant "Golden Apple".  Thus the two expressions again support one-another. After the "AL TANRI" town was built and ruled for a century or so by the Etruscan kings, it was invaded and usurped by the Romans who called it "ROMA". At the opportune time the Romans completely razed the old town ALBA LONGA - not to be built again. The Romans did the same thing to the Carthaginian town of CARTHAGA.

The ancient wanderers had the habit of getting into the names of Turanian peoples but only after totally altering the name that they wanted to take over. The name ITALIA is one such name; AY-HAN is another.  All of this is just like the usurpation of the Turkish people in eastern Anatolia under the manufactured name of "KURT" which is an anagram of the name TURK. The alienated Tur/Turk group is used against the main brother state until both of them become tired and weak and enemies.  Then, the usurper comes in to take control of the divided groups eventually enslaves them both. This evil trickery of dividing a unified people and putting them against each other has been perfected to its zenith point. It is no wonder that at one time they had a "god" called "IANUS" (JANUS) who had "two faces".

At this point I want to bring to the readers attention the following reference statement   [25]:

"The invading Pelasgians from Greece, and the aborigines (Umbrians, Etruscans and Oscans) combined formed the renowned Latin race, still possessing the southern part of Europe. The history of Italy is soon absorbed in that of Rome"

This reference also tells us that the core of the so-called "Latin" race was the ancient Turanian peoples. Yet many European writers bring to the forefront their "Greek" and "Roman" ancestry, that is, the "wanderer" tribes while denying the Tur/Turk identity of the core people.  This is a sad situation for the European cabalists.  In one hand they want to have a noble ancestry and in order to do that, they concocted a mythology where they adopt a noble Turanian prince of Tur/Turk peoples as an ancestor, and on the other hand they do all kinds of dishonesty to destroy that ancestry and deny completely that Turks ever existed in ancient times.  

Of course, it is not a readily acceptable and admittable situation by the usurper to spell out the real identity of the peoples whom they have robbed. The meaning of this is that when the bands of cruel and deceitful wanderers took over the native peoples of the ancient land presently called "Italia’, they obliterated the identity of the natives by way of ‘tyrannicida’, that is, from Turkish "TURANNIYI KIYDI" (TURANLIYI KIYDI) meaning "slaughtered the Turanians", and by way of assimilation, deception and lies. The Romans put the fear of death into the hearts and minds of the native pagans so that they either followed the Romans rule or they were killed.  The Romans changed the language of the native Turanians by way of anagrammatizing it into so-called "Latin". Thus ancient history became a coloured muddy haze.

The Romans and other later "Europeans" have made sure that this Turanian identity is never attached to the Etruscans and of course to the ancient natives of ITALIA. This is why they deceptively keep saying "we do not know who these ETRUSCANS were". Yet they know all too well that many Romans and Greeks went to the Etruscan schools to get educated.

When European scholars, historians and linguists deny knowing who the Etruscans were, they are being political rather than scientifically truthful. The fact is that many so-called European Romans (Rum, arayan, gezginci, çingene) studied all kinds of science and arts in the Etruscan schools.  One famed city name "CUMAEA" in Italy, which is deceptively attributed to the Greeks, and where a lot of learning was going on, is nothing but the anagrammatized Turkish name "OKUMA ÖYÜ" meaning "the home of learning".  


Encyclopaedia Britannica  [26] writes:

"SIBYLLA, a proper name, afterward used as a common noun (as we say "a Daniel"); the derivation and meaning are unknown but certainely not Greek; they are possibly Semitic. In the disturbed period preceding the development of the full classical culture, i.e., about 800-600 B.C., religious movements of all sorts were common in Greece and Asia Minor, and especially, inspired prophets were numerous. Of these one of the most famouse SIBYLLA of MARPESSUS, a village near Troy, also claimed as a native of ERYTHRAE; of her Heracleitus says (frag.12, Bywater) that "with her maddened mouth . . . . she reaches a thousand years with her voice by the power of the god", i.e., Apollo, by whom this real or imaginary person was thought to be inspired.  

It was presumably she who offered TARQUINIUS SUPERBUS nine books of prophesies, and, on his declining to pay the price asked, burned first three and then three more, finally selling the remainder for the sum she originally demanded for all. (Ovid, Metamorphises, xiv, 130 et seq.;  Dionysius Hal. iv, 62). Of the official collection supposed thus to have originated, one or two fragments still survive (see Diels, Sibyllinische Blätter).

Finally, Jewish and Christian apologists discovered a Judaean or Babylonian Sibyl, to whom were attributed the numerous prophecies, still extant, containing Judaeo-Christian propaganda."

This citing says a lot of things about the identity of the personality so-called SIBYLLA.  All attributions are said in vague terms and riddles.  

While SIBYLLA is certainely not Greek, she is not Semitic either.  The origin of SIBYLLA is Turkish and that is why it is said that its derivation and meaning are unknown. SIBYLLA is a female personification of "knowledge and learning". the name SIBYLLA is an anagrammatized form of the Turkish word:

a) "BILISLU" (BILISLI), where S is Turkish Sh sound, meaning "with knowledge".  

b)  "BILUS AL" (BILIS AL) meaning "taking knowledge" or "learning knowledge", particularly by going to a school.

The root word is the Turkish verb "bilmek" meaning "to know’ from which is derived the words BILIS meaning "knowing" and BILISLI meaning "with knowledge", and "BILGI" meaning "knowledge". The so-called "prophetes" and prophetesses were supposed to know things that ordinary people did not know. And most of the time these ancient prophets were charlatans who used their "knowledge of whatever it was that they knew", and most of the time they were just babbling,  to exploite the ordinary people.

The reference source states that: "with her maddened mouth . . . . she reaches a thousand years with her voice by the power of the god".

This is very interesting and enlightening, because there is only one thing whose voice reaches thousands of years beyond, that is the "KNOWLEDGE".  Persons die but knowledge that one leaves behind does not die.  In fact it can last for thousands of years. Evidently knowledge was very important for the ancient Turanians, that is why the name of the most ancient epic story was named "BILGAMESH" representing the knowledge", but all in Turkish. The Judeo-Christians usurped all knowledge from the ancient Turanians.  

It is curious that so-called Heracleitus which is another stolen Turkish word, should speak about her. In fact in many tall-tale stories of the west, SIBYL is somehow associated with Heracleus.  This is reasonable because the so-called "Greek" name HERACLEUS was nothing but the restructured and disgused form of the Turkish expression "ER AKLI US" meaning "the mind of man, wisdom and knowledge of man".  But all in Turkish again.

It is also curious that the original Sibyl was a native of ERYTHRAE near Troy (Tur Öy), that is, in Anatolia. ERYTHRAE supposedly a village near Troy, when rearranged as "TYR-ER-EIA", is the restructured and disguised form of Turkish expression "TUR ER ÖYÜ" meaning "Home of Tur man" which describes the Tur/Turks in Turkish.  This again verifies that the so-called SIBYL or SIBYLLA was Turkish in origin.  

The Latin word SIBYLLA meaning "Sibyl)  [27], when rearranged as "BILYS-AL" is the Turkish expression "BILISh AL" meaning "to take knowledge" or "to get knowledge" or "learn knowledge".  

The Latin word SIBYLLINUS, meaning "relating to Sibyl", when rearranged as "US-BILYSLIN", is the restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "US BILISLEN" (US BILISLEN) meaning "learning wisdom" or ‘becoming knowledgable". Thus we see that we are dealing with a school where teaching is in Turkish. But the newly arrived deceptive wanderers are keen in intentionally confusing and destroying the available Turanian system in order to come up with a broken up pseudo language suitable for their purpose of confusing the one language that the whole world spoke. An act very much in line with the religious instructions given in GENESIS 11.

The name "SIBYL" (SIBYLLA)  [28], associated with the names of ancient city names.  One of them is the name "CUMAEA" in ancient Italia. The name CUMAEA is nothing but the distorted Turkish expression "OKUMA ÖYÜ", meaning "the home of learning". Sibylla of Cumaea is shown as an "elderly lady dealing with books" in the "SISTINE CHAPEL paintings of famed artist MICHELANGELO. Of course this is another form of the Turkish "BILGAMESH" or falsely restructured as "GILGAMESH" meaning "knowledge".

These are all personifications of "knowledge" that the ancient Turanian world regarded so important to their civilization and to mankind. Hence "knowledge" was immortalised in many epic stories.

I make these factual revelations to the world which has been deliberately kept in the dark by the Romans, the Church authorities and the Europeans "scholars". People all over the world have been superbly conned by some "cult" operating wanderers who invented the simple technique of altering the words and expressions of a mother/father langage that the world spoke probably during the last ten-thousand years or more.  The self serving secrecy employed by these wanderer cabalists and their conditioned helpers is primarily for the political control and exploitation of ordinary people.


With respect to the name ALBA of the name ALBA LONGA and ALBANIAN, we must also bring forward the Turkish word "ALP" meaning "difficult, hard, warrior, hero, brave, giant".

The name of the ALP mountains in Europe is pure Turkish and it comes from the Turkish word "ALP".

Additionally the name ALBA is also related to the Turkish word "AL-ABA" meaning a "crimson colored cloak or coat"  [29] as worn by the Turkish Azerbaijan and Dagistan (with mostly AVAR Turks ancestry) peoples in representing their ancient folklores.  This is also important. Avars (known as Obri in Rus’ chronicles and Abaroi or Varchonitai in Byzantine sources).

"AL-ABA" that is "a Crimson Red’ coloured cloak or coat was also a symbol of the "Red Sun" or "KIZIL GÜN" that the Turanians believed in. This would also identify the ancient "Albanians" of Azerbaijan and Dagistan area.

At this point we must also remember the name LEBANON. The state of LEBANON, which is presently being destroyed ruthlessly and intentionally by Israel, under the tolerantly watchful eyes of the west, is a country in the land of ancient Phoenicians. It is also a known fact that the Phoenicians were famous for the production of a "deep-red" (AL, KIRMIZI, KIZIL) and "purple" (MOR) coloured dye from "MUREX".  Hence RED, that is, Turkish "AL" (KIZIL) was also associated with this ancient people who were also known as TYRIANS identifying them as "TUR" people in that part of the Mediterranean Sea.  They were also the worshippers of the god "BAAL" or "AL ABA" meaning "red father". They wore royal "red coats" (cloaks or dresses) to identify themselves with their religious beliefs.

>From url:

" Purple sometimes symbolizes royalty, dating back to Roman times, when clothing dyed with Tyrian purple was limited to the upper classes due to the rarity and thus, price, of the dye. The colour, which was closer to crimson than our idea of purple, was the favored colour of many kings and queens. Byzantine empresses gave birth in the Purple Chamber of the palace of the Byzantine Emperors. Thus being named Porphyrogenitus ("born to the purple") marked a dynastic emperor as opposed to a general who won the throne by his effort. Oddly, porpora or purpure was not one of the usual tinctures in European heraldry, being added at a late date to bring the number of tinctures plus metals to seven, so that they could be given planetary associations. The classic early example of purpure is in the coat of the Kingdom of León: : argent, a lion purpure as early as 1245. In China, the Chinese name of the Forbidden City literally means "purple forbidden city".

This reference explains a lot of things that the wandering Romans and Greeks did not have themselves but took from the red and purple believing/using Turanians. The name PORPHYROGENITUS ("born to the purple") explains it very well.

The so-called "Greek" word PORPHYROGENITUS, when rearranged letter-by-letter as "PUSH-POR-YIR-TOGEN", is a restructured and disguised  form of the Turkish expression "PASI MOR YERE TOGAN" (BASI MOR YERE DOGAN) meaning "he whose head was born into purple place".  Thus, it is perfectly clear how the wanderer Greeks kept stealing the Turkish language for their broken up Greek language.  In anagrammatizing the Turkish words and phrases, they had the free hand of restructuring anyway they wanted.

Phoenicians, Carthaginians and the Etruscans were all related Turanian peoples as is also known from the Etruscan "Pyrgy Tablets" writings.

Alba Longans (or "ALGUN ALMA") people and the Etruscans also used this crimson-red colored royalty dresses.  The Romans and the Greeks got these royalty traditions from these ancient Turanians. The "crimson-red dye" is the "deep blood-red dye" that the Phoenicians were known for manufacturing it from Murex.

The Greek word PHOINIKIKOS means "Phoenician"  [30].

The Greek word PHOINIKIKOS, when rearranged letter-by-letter as "KON-POIIKISI" where the second K is an alteration of letter "C" in Turkish, reveals itself as a restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "KAN BOYACISI" meaning "blood-colored dye maker" which the the so-called Phoenicians were.  

Similarly the English word PHOENICIANS (meaning "blood coloured people"), when rearranged letter-by-letter as "CAN-POIIENSH" where the second C is an alteration of letter "K" in Turkish, is a restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "KAN BOYAYANCI" meaning "blood-colored dye painter" or "Red paint maker". These Greek and English words not only verify each other, but also verify the identity of the Phoenician people in Turkish and the reason why they called these Turanian peoples by the name "Phoenicians". It also shows once again how the Greek and English linguist anagrammatisers usurped the Turkish language and restructured words and phrases in manufacturing their pseudo languages.


[8]    Peter Croft, "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY", with Introduction by Stewart Perowne, Octopus Books, 1974, London, 1974, p. 4.
[9]    Encyclopaedia Britannica World Language Dictionary, 1963, p. 435.
[10]    Cassal’s Latin-English Dictionary, MACMILLAN, USA, 1987, p. 11.
[11]    Paul MacKendrick, "The Roman Mind at Work", D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, Toronto, London and New York, 1958, p. 99.
[12]    Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 5th edition, 1947, p. 337.
[13]    Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir Donuk, Eski Türk Devletlerinde IDARI-ASKERI ÜNVAN VE TERIMLER", Türk Dünyasi Arastirmalari Vakfi, Istanbul, 1988, s. 46.
[14]    Cassal’s Compact Latin-English, English-Latin  Dictionary, 1962, p. 140.
[15]    Cassal’s Latin-English Dictionary, MACMILLAN, USA, 1987, p. 233.
[16]    Peter Croft, "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY", with Introduction by Stewart Perowne, Octopus Books, 1974, London, 1974, p. 5.
[17]    Peter Croft, "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY" with Introduction by Stewart Perowne, Octopus Books, 1974, London, p. 5.
[18]     Divry’s Modern English-Greek and Greek-English Dictionary, New York, 1988, p. 516.
[19]    Cassal’s Compact Latin-English, English-Latin  Dictionary, 1962, p. 110.
[20]    Paul MacKendrick, "The Roman Mind at Work", D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, Toronto, London and New York, 1958, p. 95.
[21]    Paul MacKendrick, "The Roman Mind at Work", D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, Toronto, London and New York, 1958, p. 16.
[22]    Werner Keller, "The Etruscans", p. xiii.
[23]    Peter Croft, "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY" with Introduction by Stewart Perowne, Octopus Books, 1974, London, p. 9.
[24]    Cassal’s Compact Latin-English, English-Latin  Dictionary, 1962, p. 12.
[25]    "The Time Chart History of The World" by Third Millennium Trust, Chippenham, England, 1997, p. 6 from front cover, between time lines of 1600 B.C. and 1500 B.c.
[26]    Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 20, 1963, p. 602.
[27]    Cassal’s Compact Latin-English, English-Latin  Dictionary, 1962, p. 231.
[28]    Peter Croft, "ROMAN MYTHOLOGY", with Introduction by Stewart Perowne, Octopus Books, 1974, London, 1974, p. 29.
[29]    Redhouse Turkish-English Dictionary, Istanbul, 1987, p. 2.
[30]    Divry’s Modern English-Greek and Greek-English Dictionary, New York, 1988, p. 731.

Best wishes to all,

Polat Kaya

End of PART-2.   (PART-3   to follow)