Polat Kaya



The ancient Turanian civilization was a world wide civilization.  It has been referred to as the "Turkish Era"  (Tarih-i Türk) in history.The Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples were the believers of the One Sky-Father-God, Sun-God and Moon-God trinity.  This religious belief was so potent in ancient Turanian society that expressions describing God were used as the titles of rulers, country names, city names, names of important establishments, topographical names, etc. and man himself (i.e., man's head and his creation capabilities) were composed in a way that they contained the names of the sun, moon and the sky-god).  This tradition was carried everywhere the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples moved and established new civilizations. 

It seems that until some 3000 years ago, the world spoke one language and that one language was Turkish.  I have analyzed many non-Turkish words with their given meanings and found that embedded in them were Turkish words or expressions with the same meaning - or a similar meaning - which cannot be due to coincidence.

The ancient world was dominated by the Turkish speaking Turanians and Turkish was the dominant language that the world was speaking. However, the world (i.e., Asia, Europe, Middle East and North Africa) went through an upheaval where this ancient Turanian Sky-God, Sun-God and Moon-God worshipping civilization was subjected to internal and external opposition by secretive religious cults and eventually toppled.  These secretive cults, under the guise of religion, first captured the top hierarchy of the existing societies most everywhere where they claimed to be the middlemen between God and the public.  Once in that supposedly "reputable" and "reverand" position, they captured the wealth of the country as well as the control of the country by politics and intrigue.  This way, they were also controlling the kings of the country as well.  They grew so powerful that they were not even subject to the laws of the country or the authority of the kings.  They created a class system where they were at the top - and quite frequently they acted as kings themselves.  These religious cult organizations and their members manufactured new languages from the existing Turkish language by way of altering the Turkish words and phrases.  The manufactured words and languages looked and sounded totally different than the existing Turkish.  But the original Turkish source text used for the manufacture of each word was not lost in the process.  It remained embedded in a confused manner in the body of the new words.  With this knowledge about languages, and with the meaning attributed to these non-Turkish words, many of them can be deciphered and the Turkish text material used for the formation of such words can be recovered. I have deciphered the Turkish linguistic source for more than 2000 words belonging to the Indo-European languages.

In ancient India, there was a very long lasting SUN-EMPIRE, called SURYAVANSHA, [http://www.polatkaya.net/Sun_Empire_of_Ancient_India.html], creating a civilization that has been the pride of Indian people. This Sun Empire was founded by the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples in Indian sub continent.  Turkish words and names that belonged to the founders of that great Sun Empire have been altered and disguised into the so-called "Sanskrit" language by the writers of Vedic documents. 
This was very much the same language alteration trick used by the Greeks, Romans, other so-called "Aryans", Semites, and others who also manufactured so many different languages from Turanian Turkish.  In this paper, I want to examine and discuss some of the names related to this Sun Empire of ancient India, that is, the Empire of so-called"KSHATRIYA" 

India has been a Turanian country since very ancient times, but this fact has been obliterated by Aryan Brahmin clergy by confusing and converting the native Turkish language into what is called "Sanskrit" and other languages of India.  The nameHINDUSTAN is a living testament to that fact. Interestingly, in one meaning, the name  BRAHMIN, rearranged as "HAIN-BRM",  is the altered, restructured and  Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "HAIN BiReM" meaning "I am the evil one".  The Brahmins, under the guise of being "godly" people, were  culturally public exploiting, money and land hording, usury operating and archaic Aryan intelligencia of their times.  For their secretive organizations, they collected all kinds of Kshatriya information in Turkish and encrypted them into the words of so-called "Sanskrit" language. The mythological Vedic writings were their way of covering up their activities and controlling the unsuspecting public. Sophistication by garbled verbology, that is, reproducing information composed in Turkish message in a confused and distorted way, was best deception technic used by them just like the Semitic magician and sorcerer priests of ancient Babylonia and Greece did. This explains why Brahmins and they law making collaborators eventually annihilated the Kshatriyas of ancient India.  The so-called KURUKSHETRA war was their secret planning to tople and annihilate the Turanian Kshatriya people who ruled ancient India.


"The Kurukshetra War detailed in the Hindu epic Mahabharata was between the ancient Hindu clans of Kaurava and Pandavaand lasted eighteen days.

On day one, Kaurava army stood facing west and the Pandava army stood facing east. On day one wind blew from east to west, against the Kauravas. In the morning when the war started, the Padavas appeared illuminated due to the sunshine on their faces and the Kauravas appeared shaded and dark."

This tells us that the battle was between the Sun (Sunshine) believing PANDAVAS  personifying the Kshatriyas who were illuminated by the sunlight early in the morning and the "Black" (night, shadow)  believing KAURAVA, which is a name that has been made up from Turkish "KARA-AVU"  (KARA EVI) meaning the "Black House" (Evil House). They were the "SETI" (Black Evil God)  believing Aryans.  So it was a war in ancient India between the Turanian Kshatriyas and the Brahmin"Karaevler" (i.e., Black Houses, the Evil Lords). Thus the war was between the "good" and the "evil" beliefs. 

The name  KURUKSHETRA supposedly is the name of a place where this war took place in ancient India.  But hidden in this name is another Turkish phrase related to the annihilation of Kshatriyas.  The name  KURUKSHETRA, rearranged as "TURKU-KERASH", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "TÜRKÜ KIRIŞ" meaning "killing the Turk" . Evidently, this must have been an intentional setup to kill the royal Kshatriya Turks in India by the Aryan Brahmins and their law-teaching collaborators and the Brahmin warriors so-called PARASURAMA!  There is a similar word in "Latin" language known as TYRANNICIDA  (tyrennicide)  which is a Romanized (Aryanized) Turkish expression "TURANNI KIYDI" (Turanlilari öldürdü) meaning "mass killing of Turanians".  This term is another alternative way of saying "genocide".  The namePARASURAMA, in one meaning, is the Turkish expression "PARACU RAMA" meaning "money owning, Moon-believer"Aryans, and in the other, it is the Turkish expression "PARA AŞURMA" meaning "stealing money from any one and every one who is an easy target  for exploitation".  This exploitation system has been carried to present times by the money manipulating and operating establishments. 



In support of what I said above about the world wide presence of ancient Turanians, I would also like to bring to the attention of the reader the following paper by HYDE CLARKE entitled "THE TURANIAN EPOCH OF THE ROMANS, AS ALSO OF THE GREEKS, GERMANS, AND ANGLO-SAXONS, IN RELATION TO THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE WORLD", published in "the Transactions of the Royal Historical Society", Vol. VIII, 1880, p. 172 -222.

Let me cite just one paragraph from the research of Hyde Clarke:

"My own researches, as laid in detail this year before the Philological Society, fully establish the character of the Etruscans as a Turanian language, belonging to one great group, or family of families, allied to the languages of all the nations of early culture, the pre-Hellenic, Thracian, Phyrigian, Lydian, Carian, Georgian, Canaanite, the Akkad of Babylonia, and Egyptian. Among modern languages the analogues are with Basque, Ugro-Altaic, Georgian, many languages of India and Further India, Japanese, Coptic, and the languages of higher culture of Central, Western, and Southern Africa, and many languages of North, South, and Central America." 

This revelation by Hyde Clarke implies that the Turanian language of Turkish was the progenitor language for the world languages. This article supports what I have been saying all along in my writings.  Here we observe that the writer Hyde Clarke is also referring to many Indian Languages being from the family of Turanian languages. In this regard, Sanskrit is one of the major languages of Indian sub continent that has been manufactured from Turkish by the Vedic writing Aryan Brahmin clerics. The Sun and Moon Empires of ancient India, that is, so-called SURYAVANSHA and CHANDRAVANSHA, were the Turkish speaking Turanianempires whose language was replaced in time with "Sanskrit". Sanskrit, just like Greek, Latin and all other "Indo-European" languages, is also a language that has been manufactured artificially from Turkish! 



The following online reference also provides enlightening and supporting information:



Ancient India and Central Asia, 
Talk:Ancient India and Central Asia


Ancient India and Central Asia have long traditions of socio-cultural, political and economic contact since remote antiquity. The two regions have common and contiguous borders, climatic continuity, similar geographical features and geo-cultural affinity. There has always been uninterrupted flow of men, material and the ideas between the two. So much so, some ancient literary sources trace common lineage for Indians, Iranians and other nationalities of Central Asia.
thumb|[Physical map of Central Asia from the Caucasus in the northwest, to Mongolia in the northeast.]

Literary sources

Zend Avesta states that the ancestors of Iranian, Indian and  Turanian people were the three sons of Tratoria, namely, Arya, Sairimia and Tura. 

Turk and Mansak, two brothers, are stated to be ancestors of the Turks and Mongols. 

Abu Qasim Farishta gives an interesting account of the genealogy of the Indians and the Central Asians. 

Ancient Indian literary sources like Puranas, Ramayana, Mahabharata and numerours other texts also provide plenty of evidence on historical, cultural and political links between ancient India and Central Asian nations. 

It is a fact of history that the Kambojas, Sakas, Kushanas, Hunas, Turks and Mughals all came to India from Central Asia, as is frequently attested by the ancient Indian texts. "

 About the name TRATORIA:

 The name TRATORIA, rearranged as "ATA-TOR-RI", is from the Turkish expression "ATA TUR ERI" meaning "Father Tur Man", "Father Turk Man". Thus, the so-called name TRATORIA was actually the ancestors of Turanians who migrated to all directions on earth including Iran and India. But the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples in Iran and India were subjected to artificially implemented identity changes, as they were done so in the middle east and Europe by those who call themselves Aryan and Semite.  These groups have collaborated in obliterating evrything related to Tur, Turk, Oguz, Turan, Tanru names and all other Turanian related entities.

b)    Additionally, the name TRATORIA, rearranged as "TATAR-RI-O", is from the Turkish expression "TATAR ERI O"meaning "he is the Tatar man",  "he is the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz man".

c)    Furthermore, the name TRATORIA, rearranged as "TOR-IATAR", is from the Turkish expression "TUR ÖYÜDÜR"(TURANDUR) meaning "it is the house of TUR",  "it is the house of Turanians", "it is Turan".   

These decipherments of the Aryanized name of TRATORIAclearly identifies that the ancient world of Central Asia, India and Iran were populated by the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples before they were artificially "Indo-Aryanized" and "Iran Aryanized" by the so-called ancient "Aryan" and "Semite" religious groups of India, Iran and the Middle East. 



We have the following background information (

After looking at the different warrior clans of India (which, have other zillion sub castes within them)…  we can come to the conclusion that Indians are a martial race! Anyways, we get back to the beginning and understand what the Kshatriyas were all about? Kings, royal folks, soldiers, etc, etc…

So lets turn the wheels of time back, initially in ancient Vedic society, the kshatriya position was achieved on the merits of a person’s aptitude (guna), conduct (karma), and nature (swabhava). The earliest Vedic literature listed the Kshatriya (holders of ksatra, or authority) as second in rank, after the Brahmins (priests and teachers of law), before the Vaisya (merchant-traders, farmers and some artisan castes), and the Sudra (labourers, some farming castes and other artisan castes).

Movements of individuals and groups from one class to another, both upward and downward, were not uncommon; a rise in status even to the rank of Kshatriya was a recognized reward for outstanding service to the rulers of the day. Over the years it became hereditary. In modern times, the Kshatriya varna includes a broad class of caste groups, differing considerably in status and function but united by their claims to rulership, the pursuit of war, or the possession of land.

The legend that the Kshatriyas, with the exception of the Ikshvakus, were destroyed by Parasurama, the sixth reincarnation of Vishnu, as a punishment for their tyranny is thought by some scholars to reflect a long struggle for supremacy between priests and rulers that ended in victory for the former. By the end of the Vedic era, the Brahmins were supreme, and the Kshatriya had fallen to second place.

The persistent representation of deities (especially Vishnu, Krishna, and Rama) as rulers underscores the point, as does the elaborate series of ritual roles and privileges pertaining to kings through most of history.

With the rise of Buddhism, Kshatriyas regained their position as first of the four varnas. The murder of the last Maurya emperor Brhadrata by his Brahmin general Pusyamitra Sunga, and the subsequent decline of Buddhism in India, marked Brahmin supremacy once more in Eastern India. Western India remained a stronghold of Kshatriya clans as epitomized by Rajputana and the powerful Kshatriya empire that ruled from Ujjain right up to the Islamic incursions led to a downfall of the Chauhan Kshatriyas in Delhi.

Dutiful Warrior

A ruler was bound by the holy scriptures to govern as a Dharma-Raja (Just Rule), with the main duties being protection of his subjects and livestock.

* The Rig Veda states:

praja arya jyotiragrah’. RV, VII. 33.17

People ruled by Aryans are led by the Divine light. King Rama of Ayodhya is considered the greatest of the Dharma-Rajas:

arya sarva samascaiva sadaiva priyadarsanah

An Aryan who worked for the equality of all, was dear to everyone. Rama is also considered an avatar of Vishnu.

* The Ramayana states:

Like the ancient monarch Manu, father of the human race
Dasaratha ruled his people with a father’s loving grace.

The Brahmin varna was reddish as the sky before dawn, Kshatriya varna as the Sun at noon, Vaishya as the evening sky and Shudra the color of night sky. Gradually, the Varna system caught hold of Indian Sub Continent and each varna did its job as per guidelines of Brahma. Brahmins and Kshatriyas,Vaishyas were the upper castes and Shudras the lower castes. Both, Brahmins and Kshatriyas were allowed to study the Vedas.

Kshatriyas (pronounced as shatria) also studied the ancient martial arts which were eventually carried by Buddhist monks like Bodhidharma (a Kshatriya) to China and Japan. The Rig Veda refers to the ways in which Gods four body parts make up the four classes, depending on the nature or values that the human holds. This was interpreted as meaning that no one caste is more important than the other and that society cannot survive without all parts working together.

According to Bhagvata, Mair Kshatriyas are one of the oldest. Basically Mair Kshatriyas from Brahamaji vanshavali King Ajmeerd, Ajmer Jesalmer Badmer are some of ancient cities of mer or mair kshatriyas . Ancient Median Empires also belongs Indian mair kshatriyas. The Medes are credited with the foundation of the first Iranian empire, the largest of its day until Cyrus the Great established a unified Iranian empire of the Medes and Persians, often referred to as the Achaemenid Persian Empire, by defeating his grandfather and overlord, Astyages the shah of Media. According to the Sumerian(mair) king list, the first five rulers of Akkad (Sargon, Rimush, Manishtusu, Naram-Sin,(NARSING) and Shar-kali-sharri) ruled for a long time.

Sargon built a large empire in the late 8th or the 7th century B C lists no fewer than 65 cities and lands belonging to that empire. Yet, even if Magan and Kapturu (Crete) are given as the eastern and western limits of the conquered territories, Sargon appointed one of his daughters priestess of the moon god in Ur. She took the name of Enheduanna and was succeeded in the same office by Enmenanna, a daughter of Naram-Sin. Enheduanna must have been a very gifted woman; two Sumerian hymns by her have been preserved, and she is also said to have been instrumental in starting a collection of songs dedicated to the temples of Babylonia. (Mesopotamia to the end of the Old Babylonian period » Sumerian civilization » Sumer and Akkad from 2350 to 2000 bc) Mair Kshatriyas had ruled over in Cambodia as “Khmer(mair) Kings”. Khmer, Sumer, Medes and Mair are same.”Khmer King Surya Verman is well known in ancient history. requires more research. "

About the name ARYAN:

First, we should clearify the term ARYAN.  The etymology of the term is given in Wikipedia, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan#Etymology], as:


"The English word “Aryan” is derived from the Sanskrit word ārya meaning 'noble';[1] it was used initially as a national name to designate the worshippers of the Devas and especially Indra according to Brahmanical principles (performance of sacrifice,Yajna).[1][19]
The Zend airya 'venerable' and Old Persian ariya are also considered as national names.[1][12]

They call themselves as the designate worshippers of the DEVAS, and especially INDRA.  But the term INDRA is nothing but the altered and disguised form of the Turkish word TANRI meaning "God" of Turanians.  Thus, they altered and usurped this Tuaranian Turkish name for God. The "Aryan" clergy of all kinds have been doing this usurpation of Turkish culture for thousands of years. 

The Sanskrit term ARYAN is from Turkish expression "ARAYAN" meaning "wanderer" or "gypsy". ARYAN priests usurped the name-shell of the Turanians everywhere and the Turanian Kshatriyas (i.e., Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples) in India.  As they stole the Turkish language by altering and restructuring the words and expressions of Turkish into manufactured non-Turkish  languages, they also stole the ancient image of the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples.  In this process, they also vilified the Turanians as they pleased. The so-called "Aryanism" was a habitually and culturally exploitative system using every deceptive means to benefit unfairly from theworks and the ancient civilization of Turanians. By altering and restructuring the ancient Turkish, they achieved this usurpation very effectively to present times.  'Aryan' priests everywhere restructured the clan names, tribe names , country names, king names, personal names, etc.  of the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Thus, they called these newly restuctured names as belonging to "ARYANS". By this deceptive manipulation, the ethnic identity of countless Turanian  peoples have been altered into "ARYAN" identity.  This very sneaky yet highly effective system has not been easy to detect for so long! With this linguistic trick, the world public has been intentionally conned and exploited!


"The Sanskrit devá- derives from Indo-Iranian *devá- which in turn descends from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) word,*deiwos, originally an adjective meaning "celestial" or "shining", which is a PIE (not synchronic Sanskrit) vrddhi derivative from the root *diw meaning "to shine", especially as the day-lit sky. The feminine form of PIE *deiwos is PIE *deiwih2, which descends into Indic languages as devi, in that context meaning "goddess".

The etymology given for this word above is not truthful. The word DEVA is from the Turkish word DEV meaning "giant, very large".  The Sanskrit word DEIWOS, with the bogus letter W able to represent UU or VV or YY or UV or UY or VY,  and in this case representing UY, makes DEIWOS to be "DEIUYOS".  Now this word DEIUYOS, rearranged as "EY-OUS-DI", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "AY OUS'DI" (AY OGUZ'DU) meaning "it is the Moon-God (Ay Oguz)".  Of course, the Moon is a "celestial and shining being".  And, it is a DEV (i.e. a giant sized object) that has been personified!  Thus, attributing this altered Turkish expression DEIWOS (AY OUS'DI) to so-called "Proto Indo-European" (PIE) is a bogus concoction because I just showed that it was from Turkish - and its original Turkish meaning has been intentionally obscured.  Similarly, the term ARYA, is from Turkish "AY ER" meaning "moon man". Moon itself is a wanderer around the earth. The"nobility" meaning attributed to "ARYA" is from the Turanian name for the  Moon-God  (i.e., "Ay Tanri" in Turkish).

In ancient Turanian religion, the Sun-God, Moon-God and Sky-God concepts were mythologically personified as "ER" meaning"man", "human-being" of sky.  And these trinity sky deities were of course "the noble ones".  Hence so-called ARYA, that is,"AY AR" 
(AY ER, AY TANRI) in Turkish, had also the meaning of "nobility".  In this context, those who worshipped the Moon-God could also be regarded as "noble" like the Sky-God, the Sun-God and Moon-God worshipping Tranians were called noble peoples.  However, the Brahmin clergy made use of this ancient religious meaning as a self serving means to call themselves"noble", and in time the Turanian Kshatriyas not so noble as themselves. Thus, the Brahmins artificially elevated themselves above all others.  This deception by them kept this so-called "ARYAN" group  as the top-class men in the Indian society. It was a deceptive way of exploiting the public by appearing as a "godly noble" people to the rest of the community. Thus, the "ARYAN"nobility was a fictional convenient deception.  

In this regard, the summary information given in the following url link on the Internet is also enlightening and it refers to an Aryan fiction:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3612/is_200310/ai_n9266521/ .  [ARYANS, JEWS, BRAHMINS: THEORIZING AUTHORITY THROUGH MYTHS OF IDENTITY, By Dorothy Figueira, New York: State University of New York Press , 2002. 300 p].



About the name KSHATRIYA-1:

Now let us turn back to Kshatriyas.  The above given background information about the Kshatriya people in India reveals the ethnic identity of some of the people who constituted the people of Kshatriya 

In addition to this reference source, we also have the following references (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kshatriya) about Kshatriya people:


"In Sanskrit, it is derived from kṣatra, meaning "roof, umbrella, dominion, power, government" from a root kṣī "to rule, govern, possess". Old Persian xšaθra ("realm, power"), xšaθrya ("royal"), and xšāyaθiya ("emperor") are related to it, as are the New Persian words šāh ("emperor") and šahr ("city", "realm"). The Thai word for "king", kasat, and the Malay word for "knight" or "warrior", kesatria or satria, are also derived from it. The term denotes aristocratic status.

In the early Vedic civilization, the warrior caste was called rājanya (or kšatrīya). Rājanya was an adjectival form of rāja "ruler, king" from a root rāj "to rule", cognate to the Latin rex "king", the German Reich "empire/realm", and the Thai racha "king". In Persia, the satraps, or "kshatrapa", were the governors, or "protectors", of the Persian Empire's provinces."

The "Kshatriya" related terms given above were all originally expressions from Turkish as we shall see below. In dealing with the decipherment of names such as the name KSHATHRA, it must be remembered that they were the people who worshipped the Sun and the Moon who initially founded the Sun Empire in ancient India (Hindustan).  Hence many of their names are sun related but composed in Turkish first before the Turkish source text was converted into a restuctured alien format called either "Sanskrit" or other so-called "Aryan" languages.  

The name KSHATRIYA is, what I call, one of many Aryanized "one word" information storage system (memory, container) where information related to and describing the word in question are stored within the body of the word in the form of Turkish descriptive expressions. The relevant information saved in the word is revealed when it is deciphered in different ways revealing its contents in Turkish expressions.  This I will show as we continue examine the word KSHATRIYA 

In view of the background information in the above given citing, let us now decipher the KSHATRIYA related words. 

a)    Supposedly, old Persian term KSHATHRA meaning (realm, power), rearranged as "SHAH-ASKRT" or "SH-ASKARTH", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "ŞAH ASKARIDI (ŞAH ASKERIDI) meaning "it is the soldiers of the King".  Indeed, without the army of a king, he is not a ruler, therefore, the power of a king is measured by the strength of his army. This decipherment shows that the source of the so-called "old Persian" word KSHATHRA was actually a Turkish expression restructured into a newly manufactured language (so-called Persian) that did not exist before. 

b)    Old Persian KSHATHRYA meaning (royal), rearranged as "TYRK SHAHA", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "TÜRK ŞAHI" meaning "the Turk King" who is, of course, like any other king, a royal person!  This again shows that not only is the source of the name KSHATHRYA Turkish but also the KSHATHRYA peoples were Turkish speaking Turanians. 

c)    Old Persian KSHAYATHIYA meaning (emperor), rearranged as "KYYA-SHAHTI-A", where letter Y is a replacement for letters U and V also, is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "GÖYE ŞAHTI O" meaning "he is King to Sky". And therefore, "He is the God".  In ancient Turanian civilization, kings or emperors called themselves as "God".  So this "old Persian" word is also from Turkish!   Additonally, this term KSHAYATHIYA is also a form of the Turkish expression "KÖYE ŞAHTI O"meaning "he is King to village (country)". 

It is interesting to note that even the so-called English word "COUNTRY", rearranged as "COYUNTR",  is an angrammatized form of the Turkish expression "KÖYÜNDÜR" meaning "it is your village".   Your village, my village, our village, their village, etc., are all part of a country. 

Furthermore, the term  KSHAYATHIYA, rearranged as "KYYA-ISHAHTA", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "GÖYE IŞIHTI" meaning "he is Light to Sky", and, therefore, "he claims to be the sun and the sunlight to the sky and the world" 

With such deifying titles composed in Turkish, the bearers of the title become an emperor and a royal person.  At this point, I would like to point out that the so-called "Persian" term  "SHAH" meaning "king" is nothing but the altered form of the Turkish word"IŞIH" (I
ŞIK) meaning "light".  Indeed "LIGHT" is the king not only to the earth and its dwellers but also to the universe. 

Turkish word ŞAH means "king" ŞAHTI means "is the king" GÖY (GÖK) means "sky; blue" GÖYE means "to sky"IŞIH (IŞIK) means "light", IŞIHTI (IŞIKTI) means "is the light", KÖY means "village".

d)    The Malay words for "knight" (warrior on horse) or "warrior", kesatria or satria, are also said to have been derived from the term KSHATHRYA.  This is also enlightening. The Malay word  KESATRIA meaning "knight" or "warrior", rearranged as"ASKERTI-A", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "ASKERDI O" meaning "he is soldier, he is warrior".  Hence, its source is also from Turkish.

e)    Additionally, the Malay word kesatria or satria for "knight", that is, "warrior on horse", is also enlightening. The Malay word  KESATRIA, rearranged as "AT-ASKERI", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "AT ASKERI"meaning "horse soldier, the cavalry, knight".   Again the source of this Malay word is from Turkish.  Even the Malay wordSATRIA is just KESATRIA with the KE chopped off. 

Turkish word AT means "horse", ASKER means "soldier, warrior" AT ASKERI means "horse soldier, cavalry".

f)    Additionally, the Malay word  KESATRIA, rearranged as "ASKERIAT", is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "ASKERIYEDI" (ASKER ÖYIDI) meaning "it is the house of soldier, it is the house of warriors, it is the house of Army".  Thus again it is from Turkish rather than so-called "old Persian" or "new Persian". 

g)   The 
KSHATRIYAS were rulers who ruled people with most fairness and justice.  In this context, when the name KSHATRIYAis rearranged as "HK-ITARASY", it reveals itself as the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "HaK IDARESI" meaning"government of law, right, justice and Godliness". This shows the law obeying and just leadership character of the Kshatriya peoples. 

h)    Similarly, in this context, when the name KSHATRIYA is rearranged as "KSHY-ITARA", it is from the Turkish expression"KiŞI IDARA" (ADAM IDARE) meaning "man governing" or "governing by man".  This refers to an ancient KSHATRIYAgovernment system which is presently used, even with kings and queens, and called "democracy" 

Turkish word KiŞi means "man, person", IDARA (IDARE) means "governing", ADAM means "man, person". 

Alternatively, in this context, when the name 
KSHATRIYA is rearranged as "KHYS-ITARA", it is from the Turkish expression"GUZ IDARA" (OGUZ IDARE) meaning "Oguz (man) governing" or "governing by Oguz man".  This refers to a fair ancient government system of KSHATRIYA  peoples. 

i)   The Greek form of the word "Democracy" is DEMOKRATIA (DEMOKRATIYA).  But the term DEMOKRATIYA, rearranged letter-by-letter as "ADAM-ITREKY-O" or as "ATM-IDAREKY-O", where the last letter K is C/S,  is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "ADAM IDARESI"  meaning "man governing" or "governing by men".  But this is the same as the above decipherment of the name 
KSHATRIYA.  In other words, the 
"ADAM-IDARESI", that is, the so-called "Democracy", although claimed to be a "Greek" invention, was probably practiced by Kshatriyas as well much earlier.  Considering the fact that ancient Greeks stole the Turkish language to manufacture the "Greek" language, and together with it, every cultural concept belonging to Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples, it is highly likely that the concept of Democracy was also usurped by the Aryan Greeks. 

j)   The term "SHARIYAT" is said to be from Urdu and Persian.  Urdu is a Turanian language based on Turkish and mixed with words of so-called "Persian".  Just like all Indo-European languages, "Persian" has also been manufactured from Turkish. Iran was a Turkish speaking country of Turanian peoples before it was Aryanized by the Achaemenid Dynasty, that is, during the time that this dynasty was in power in Iran (550 - 330  B.C.). 


The Achaemenid Empire (Persian: امپراتوری هخامنشی) (c. 550–330 B.C.E.), pronounced /əˈkiːmənɨd/,     also known as thePersian Empire, was the successor state of the Median Empire, expanding to eventually rule over significant portions of the ancient world which at around 500 B.C.E. stretched from the Indus Valley in the east, to Thrace and Macedon on the northeastern border of Greece.[1] 

The Turanian MEDE Empire was taken over (stolen) by instigating an internal revolt against the MEDE  by the so-called"Persians", by another name, the "PARASHURAMA" (i.e.,  the name corresponding to  Turkish expressions "PARACU RAMA", "PARA ASHURMA", "HARAMU-PARA" and "FARS ARAMI" (Fars Aramaic) in Turkish), that is, the Aryan money-owner-warriors of the Indo-Aryan 'religious cast' of Brahmins in India. See the analyses of PARASHURAMA below.

It seems that somehow the historians particularly accentuate the so-called "Achamenid" Dynasty in Irand because it is Aryan and Aramaic instigated usurpation from Turanians, yet the MEDE empire of Turamian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples not only artificially become "Aryanized" but also the civilization of these Turanians are intentionally obliterated and alienated from Turanian Turkish peoples.  This has been the doings of the Aryan and the Semitic priests throughout the history against the Turanians.

k)   It seems that the name "SHARIYAT" of the Islamic canonical law, is already in the name 
KSHATRIYA .  This we see as follows:

When the name 
KSHATRIYA is rearranged as "K-SHARIATY", it reveals within itself the anagrammatized form of the term"SHARIAT" (ŞERIYAT) presently meaning "governing with Islamic canonical law".  Yet far earlier than the Islamic Era,  the Kshatriya seems to have embodied that concept and acted in their ruling people in India. Curiously, even the name "canon" is the Turkish word "kanun" meaning "law".  It seems that this ancient Turanian governing system by KSHATRIYAS, that is, "government by law, rights, justice and godliness" has been turned into the Islamic law. We must remember that the ruling system exercised by the Kshatriyas was taken over by the Aryan Brahmin clergy and the Abrahamic Semitic clergy after the annihilation of theKSHATRIYAS in India. 

l)   In Persia, the satraps, or "kshatrapa", were the terms used for "governors" or the "protectors" of the "Persian" Empire's provinces. Now let us understand the Turkish identity of these two so-called "Persian" names: 

Let us first understand the name "KSHATRAPA" meaning "governor" or "protector". The name "KSHATRAPA", rearranged letter-by-letter as "TARK-PASHA", is the restructured and Persianized form of the Turkish expression "TURK PAŞA" meaning "Turkish General" (i.e., military high ranking soldier) who is not only the head of an army unit but is also frequently appointed as a governor of a province.  In this capacity. the "TURK PAŞA" is the "ruler and the protector" of the area he is appointed to govern.  Thus, clearly, we see that this so-called "Persian" word or title has also been intentionally manufactured from Turkish by first breaking a Turkish expression into parts then restructuring them in a different format which is then artificially termed "Persian".  Of course, with this secretive process, not only has the Turkish language spoken throughout ancient Iran been usurped and obliterated, but also the Turkish speaking Turanians of ancient Iran have been Aryanized - and thus, alienated from being Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. The ancient Turanian civilization in Iran has been intentionally converted to an alien "ARYAN" civilization that did not exist in Iran before.

Now let us understand the name "SATRAPS" again meaning "governor" or "protector". The name "SATRAPS", rearranged letter-by-letter as "PASSATR", is the restructured and Persianized form of the Turkish expression "PAŞATiR" meaning  "he is Military General" who is again a "protector" and also a "governor" of a province. 

The English word 
PROTECTOR, (a person who protects or defends someone or something), rearranged letter-by-letter as"COROR-TEPT", is the restructured and Anglicized form of the Turkish expression "KORUR TEPeTi" (KORUR BAŞTI)meaning  "he is the defending head", "he is the protecting person" which shows that even this English word has been constructed using a Turkish expression.

Turkish word KORUMAK means "to defend, to protect", KORU means "defend, protect" KORUR means "he/she/it who defends, he/she/it who protects" TEPE means "head, person" TEPEDI (BAŞTI) means "it is the head, it is the person".



About the name KSHATRIYA-2:

The above decipherments of the KSHATRIYA related words proved to us that KSHATRIYA people were Turkish speaking Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. They worshipped the Sky-God, Sun-God and Moon-God religious concepts  and with this godly guiding belief, they had founded the great Sun Empire of India, ruled it, guided it and protected their people in ancient India such that they have been the pride of India.  In this context, the name KSHATRIYA also has embedded in it other Turkish expressions that describe their Turanian identities in a number of ways - but all in Turkish. In this context, what we will see below will show the power of the Turkish language, in terms of Turkish words and phrases embedded in names and words of Indo-European languages and other languages. Words are powerful.  No wonder that the ancient Masarians (Misir, so-called "Egypt") were talking about the"power of words" and the "WORD" was declared as "God". The following decipherments of the name KSHATRIYA further identify the Turanian identity of these peoples of ancient India.

a)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHAS-TYR-IA" or "KHYS-TAR-IA", (where letter "Y" is a multi identity letter that can be "Y" or "U" or "V" as required), is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "GUZ-TUR ÖYÜ"  (OGUZ TUR EVI)  meaning "House of OGUZ and TUR".  Letter combination KH also gives the soft letter G in Turkish. The suffix "IA" is the altered and Aryanized form of Turkish word "ÖY" (EV) meaning "house; country, family; dynasty".

b)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHYS-IATAR"
, (where KH = G and Y =  U = V), is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "GUZ ÖYÜTÜR" (GUZ ÖYÜTÜR, GUZ EVIDIR, OGUZ EVIDIR,  GÖZ ÖYIDIR,  GÜNEŞ EVIDIR,  KÖZ ÖYIDIR)  meaning "It is the House of Oguz"; "It is the House of God"; "It is the House of Sun and Moon";"It is the House of Fire".

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "TYRKSHA-IA", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "TÜRKŞE  ÖYI" (TÜRKÇE  ÖYI)  meaning "House of Turkish", that is,  "House of Turkish speaking peoples".  This identifies their language as Turkish.

d)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "TYRK-AHS-IA"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"TÜRK AGIZ ÖY" (TÜRK AGIZ EV")
 again meaning "Turkish speaking house", "Turkish speaking family of peoples". 

Turkish word AGIZ means "mouth; language, dialect" ÖY (EV) means "house; home; dynasty". 

e)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "AS-TYRKIAH", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"AS TURKIYA" (AS TÜRKIYE) meaning "One/peerless house of Turks".

f)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ASIA-TYRKH", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ASYA TÜRKI"  meaning "Asian Turks".

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "SAKA-HYITR", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"SAKA ÖYITiR" (SAKA ÖYÜTÜR)  meaning "It is house of Saka (Turks)".

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "SAHA-TYRKI" (SAKA-TYRHI), is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "SAKA TÜRKI"" meaning "Saka Turks".

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "S-YIKHARTA" (S-UIGARTA), is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "aS UYGUR'DU"  meaning "was one/peerless Uigur (Turks)" (also spelled as Uygur, Uyghur).

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYRHISTA-A", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "KURGIZ'TI O" (KIRGIZTI O; KORGÖZTI O)  meaning "he was the Kirgiz (Turks)"; "was Glowing-Fire-Eye", "was the Sun (Kirgiz)".  As can be seen, these Turanian names are based on different expressions describing the sun.

The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHY-ASARIT", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"GÖY-AZER'ITi" (GÖK AZERI'DI (GÖK AZER TÜRKIDI, GÖK HAZAR TÜRK'IDI)) meaning "was the Sky Azeri",  "was the Sky Hazar Turks".

l)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHYS-ATA-RI" (or ATA-KHYS-RI
), is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "GUZ ATA ERI" (ATA
 GUZ ERI, ATA OGUZ ERI)  meaning "Father Oguz Man", that is,"Tur/Turk/Oguz man". 

These definitions in Turkish identify the Kshatriya peoples as a mixture of ancient Turkish tribes living together in the ancient Indian subcontinent where they ruled, administered and protected the whole country against internal and external forces.

Turkish word ATA means "father; ancestor" ER means "man, soldier, hero, husband". 

m)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ISHAK-AYTR"
  or "SHAK-IATYR" reveals a restructured form of the Turkish expression "IŞIK ÖYÜTÜR"  meaning "it is House of light", "it is House of sun", "it is Sun Dynasty"; "it is house of enlightenment".  Turkish word IŞIK (IŞI) means "light".

n)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "TYRK-ISHA-A"
 or "TYRK-SHA-IA" reveals a restructured form of the Turkish expression "TURK IŞI ÖYÜ"  meaning "Light House of TURK", "Sun House of TURK", "Sun Dynasty of TURK"; "the enlightened house of TURK".

o)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "AY-ISHAKTR"
 reveals a restructured form of the Turkish expression "AY IŞIKTUR"  meaning "it is moonlight".  In this context, probably the most known Kshatrian was GOTAMA (GAUTAMA) BUDDHA, by another name,  SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA and he was from the clan of  

The clan name  GOTAMA (GAUTAMA) GOTRA, rearranged as "ATAM-GOU-TORGA", is from Turkish "ATAM GÖY TÜRK'Ü" (ATAM GÖK TÜRK'Ü) meaning "my father is from Sky-Turk clan".  This brings to light a most significant unknown aspect of the founder of Buddhism, that is, the wise man GAUTAMA BUDDHA.  It is no wonder that the Uyghur Turks were so much into Buddhism and are so famous for their Cave Paintings about Buddhism in Bezeklik, Uyghuristan. On top of that, it was the Turks who took Buddhism to China and spread it there. It becomes clear that Buddhism was conceived and composed by the Turanians in India.  But the 'Aryan' Brahmin priests who were mainly priests of sorcery and evil, intentionally instigated and manipulated the fall of the Buddhism in India in order to secure their own suptemacy in the community.  As usual they learned all kinds of knowledge from Buddhism before they destroyed it. 

p)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHYS-IATAR"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KÖZ ÖYÜTUR"  meaning "it is House of Fire", "it is House of Sun". Turkish word KÖZ means "glowing fire".

q)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KHYS-IATAR"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"GÖZ ÖYÜTÜR"  meaning "it is House of Eye", "it is House of Sun and Moon". Sun and Moon were called by the word GÖZin Turkish. Turkish word GÖZ means "eye".  Sun and Moon were also called GÖZ because they were regarded as "eyes of the Sky-God". 

All of these decipherments of the name KSHATRIYA identify the Turanian people who collectively made up the Kshatriya peoples as being Oguz, Turk, Saka, Kirgiz, Uigur (Uygur, Uyghur), and other Asian Turks living in vast areas of ancient India and making up the Sun Empire and later on, the Moon Empire of India.  So all of the ancient Turanian identity and history in India are saved in the single word of  KSHATRIYA.  Thus, it is a one-word history indicator which shows the power of the Turkish language as used then. 



About the name KSHATRIYA-3:

The following decipherments of the name KSHATRIYA identify the activities of these peoples of ancient India.


Kshatriya (Sanskrit: क्षत्रिय, kṣatriya from Sanskrit: क्षत्र, kṣatra) or Kashtriya, meaning warrior, is one of the four varnas (social orders) in Hinduism. शर्म ब्राह्मणस्य वर्म क्षत्रियस्य गुप्तेति वैश्यस्य (Pāraskara Gṛhyasūtras 17.4). It traditionally constituted the military and ruling elite of the Vedic-Hindu social system outlined by the Vedas and the Laws of Manu.

a)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ASKARIYTH", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expressionASKARIYaDI meaning "it is the House of Army",  "it is the House of Warriors".  Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz rulers are known as powerful aristocrats. The Turkish word "ORDU" meaning "army" is well known!

The above reference citing describes the KSHATRIYA warrors with the Sanskrit expression 
Pāraskara Gṛhyasūtras which identifies them clearly with the Tur/Turk/Oguz army as follow:

b)    The so-called Hindu name 
Pāraskara Gṛhyasūtras, describing the Kshatriya warriors, rearranged letter-by-letter as 
ASKARA", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "BIR GORHUSUZ TUR ASKERI" (BiR KORKUSUZ TÜRK ASKERi")  meaning "He is one fearless TUR/TURK soldier". This revelation again verifies that the KASHTRIYAS were Turkish peoples and Turkish soldiers. Indian sources described them as "the warrior people and the top administrators".  Since their names have been altered into "Sanskrit", recognizing them as Turkish speaking Turanians heve been impossible before!

c)    The so-called Hindu name Pāraskara Gṛhyasūtras, that is, another name for KSHATRIYA in Hinduism, rearranged letter-by-letter as  "PÂR-GARHUSAS-
ASKARTYR-A", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "BIR GORHUSUZ ASKERTUR O" (BIR KORKUSUZ ASKERDIR O")  meaning "He is one fearless soldier". TheKASHTRIYAS are described in the Indian sources as "the warrior people and the top administrators" 

These Turkish expressions deciphered from the name 
Pāraskara Gṛhyasūtras are composed in Azerbaijan and Uigur Turkish dialects - which were also the Turkish dialects used in ancient Anatolia, Sumeria, Iran, Middle East,  Masaria (so-called "Egypt") and evidently in India in addition to Central Asia.  This clearly explains in Turkish that the so-called KSHATRIYA or KASHTRIYAclan, that is, the people of the "House of OGUZ-TUR" were indeed the "FEARLESS TUR/TURK/OGUZ ARMY OF THE HOUSE OF OGUZ-TUR" probably since some 6000 years ago in the ancient subcontinent of INDIA.  And the "Indians" were very proud of them until Aryan Brahmin priests toppled them with sneaky and outlandish politics and intrigues. Indian peoples lived their golden years during the Sun Empire of the TUR/TURK/OGUZ peoples ruling India. 

d)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ARAYISHTK", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ARAYICITiK" (ARAYICI iDiK) meaning "we were searchers", that is, "we were searchers of knowledge", in other words,"we were Bilgamesh" - i.e., the so-called Gilgamesh. 

e)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ARISHYTAK", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ARICIYDIK" meaning "we were bee keepers". This is a factual description of Turanians.

f)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSH-IATAR"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KOŞ ÖYÜTÜR" (KOÇ ÖYÜTÜR)  meaning "it is House of RAM".   This refers to their "ram, sheep, lamb breeding culture/economy. This is a factual description of Turanians because they raised countless numbers of sheep herds. The Turkish wordKOŞ (KOÇ) meaning "ram" was one of the logos of Turanian peoples, so-called KUSHANS (CUSHITES).  

g)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSHAR-ITA"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KOŞER IDI" (KOÇER IDI) meaning "he was Ram-Man, he was fighting man, he was courageous man".  It also means "hewas ram/sheep/lamb owning man". 

h)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "SHYK-ATI-AR", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ŞOK ATI vAR" (ÇOK ATI VAR) meaning "they have many horses". This is a factual description of Turanians. 

i)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ATSHI-ARYK", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ATŞI ARIK" (ATÇI ERIK, ATÇI ERIZ) meaning "we are horse breeder men". This is a factual description of Turanians. 

j)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSHAR-AT-I"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KOŞAR AT ÖYÜ (EVI)"  meaning "house of running horse", "he was man of wild horse herds" which refers to their horse breeding and horse using culture/skills.  Turanians were the ancient people who domesticated the horse.  

Turkish word KOŞAR means "runs" AT means "horse".

k)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSH-AT-ARI"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KOŞU AT ERI" meaning "he was running horse-man"; "he was horse owning man". 

l)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "ATI-KYSHAR"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"ATI-KOŞAR" meaning "he was man who used horse for pulling". 


m)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "YKHS-IATAR", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"UKIZ ÖYÜTÜR" meaning "it is the House of bulls"; "it is the House of cattle". 

n)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSA-IATHR", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KUZU-ÖYÜTÜR meaning "it is house of lambs". Turanians have always been sheep breeders with large herds.

o)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSH-IATAR", is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KUŞ ÖYÜTUR"  meaning "it is House of Bird". All branches of Oguz Turks had adopted a "bird of prey" as one of their logo symbols - such as, Horus the Falcon was the Masarian symbol of the Sun. 

p)    The name KSHATRIYA, rearranged as "KYSH-AR-ITA"
, is a restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"KUŞ ER IDI" meaning "he was Bird-Man". Birds of prey, such as eagles, falcons, hawks and others were their logos. Also, they had domestic poultry such as geese, ducks, chickens and others.   Turkish word KUŞ means "bird" IDI means "was".



Clearly, all of these defnitions identify this most ancient clan of KSHATRIYA of India as belonging to the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples.  
Additionally, these decipherments identify some of the important activities of Kshatrias in daily life.  

The Turkish word "IDI" means "he/she/it was" and is actually the past tense of the verb "olmak" (to be) in Turkish, such asIDIM (I was), IDIN (you were), IDI (he was),  IDIK (we were), IDINIZ (you were) and  IDILER (they were).  It has the verbal suffix forms of  -Di,  DI, -DU, -DÜ, -Ti, -TI, -TU and -TÜ. This Turkish suffix has been adapted into English as the suffix -ITE, as in the term Canaanite,  to form names denoting natives of a country.  This Turkish sourced suffix is also used as an ending in many English noun formations  of many different fields.  

[Search for the definition of -ITE in English dictionaries].   from French -ite, via Latin -ita from Greek ītes.  Its origin is designated as being from Latin -itus, past participle of verbs ending in -ere and -ire.  The Latin form "-ITUS" is nothing but the Turkish word"ITUZ" (IDUZ) as noted above. 




Migration routes of the ancient Turanians from Central Asia.



About the name Non-orthodox KSHATRIYA:

In addition to what we learned above about the Turanian identities of the Kshatriayas in India, we have the following additional information about them again from the Indian sources as given in different Wikipedia links. 



Non-orthodox Kshatriyas

[See the rest of this reference in the above given Wikipedia link, or in my paper where I explain the Non-Orthodox Kshatriyas in detail at url: polatkaya.net/Non_Orthodox_Kshatriyas.html].

These ancient so-Called "KSHATRIAYAS" are identified as the Sakas (Scythians), that is, The Saka Turks, Yavanas (supposedly Indo-Greek Ionians, that is, Turkish Ayhans), the Kambojas (Central Asians), Paarada (Sinkiang, that is, Uigur Turks from Eastern Turkistan), Pahlavas (so-called "Persians" from Iran, that is, "Alav Beys" or "AL Baß" Turks), Kiratas (from Nepal, Assam, that is,from Turkish "KIR ATA"  (KUR ATA)  meaning  "man from mountains") and Daradas (that is, Turkish "Tatars" (Dadars)).  

The title "NON-ORTHODOX KSHATRIYAS" is misleading.  The Kshatriya names given above in this source are Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples whose Turkish identities are implied to be different from the Orthodox Kshatriyas and thus belonging to groups other than Turks.  This is a linguistic trick using verbology to distance Turanians from themselves.  They were Central Asian Turanians who moved to different parts of Asia, Europe and Africa (as shown in the above migration map) and created all kinds of differing civilizations.  Even the term "orthodox" verifies this fact. 

The term "orthodox" is defined as "of a person or their views, esp. religious or political ones, or other beliefs or practices,  conforming to what is generally or traditionally accepted as right or true; established and approved".  ORIGIN late Middle English : from Greek orthodoxos (probably via ecclesiastical Latin), from orthos ‘straight or right’ + doxa ‘opinion.’ [Oxford American Dictionaries]. 

The term ORTHODOX has the letter X in it which is a bogus symbol representing the multi-letter combinations of KS or EKS or IKS.  With this information substituted for X, ORTHODOX becomes ORTHODOKS. The term ORTHODOKS,  rearranged as"TOR-OKOSTH", or "TORK-OOSTH" is the altered, restructured, and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TUR OGUZ'DI" or  "TÜRK OgUZ'DI"  meaning "he is Tur/Turk/Oguz (peoples)".  This indicates that the people who originally  invented religion were the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples.  The so-called "Orthodox" Greeks usurped this ancient concept from the Turanians, and, by altering, restructuring and Hellenizing it - claimed it as their own.  This deception has come to present times while the original owners of this ancient religion, that is, the Tur/Turk/Oguz poples, have been obliterated!   Once again, I must note that the names TUR, TURK and OGUZ are not only the ancestral names of Turanians but they are also the names of the ancient Turanian Sky-God, Sun-God and Moon-God concepts. The ancient Aryan and Semitic priests have conveniently associated these names with the Greeks and the Jews rather than the Turks. This is, of course, nothing but stealing the ancient identities of the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples, their religious names and their ancient civilization.   The above citing in Wikipedia, by using the term "Non-Orthdox Kshatriyas", alienates the ancient Turanians of India from themselves as  the Sun-God, Moon-God and Sky-God worshipping peoples. 

The above etymology given by this source relates the term to Greek orthodoxos without any hint that it was the names TUR, TURK and OGUZ of the Turanians, but gives a totally different etymological concept.  It says that the term is "from Greekorthodoxos (probably via ecclesiastical Latin), from orthos ‘straight or right’ + doxa ‘opinion.’ "  This is a very interesting hint as I will show below:

Even in this concept, the Greek term ORTHODOXOS, in which the letter X is a bogus letter as I noted above, and substituting KS for X,  becomes ORTHODOKSOS.  The term ORTHODOKSOS,  rearranged as 
"DOKHRO-SOSTO", is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "DOGRU SÖZDI" meaning "it is correct words", "it is straight word", "it is right sayings". We see that even in this concept the source of the term is pure Turkish!  This is again another verification that the source and the concept of the term ORTHODOXOS did not belong to the Greeks or their manufactured language.   The fact is that the Greek linguists, who were engineering a Greek language from Turkish, stole the Turanian Turkish language and restructured its words and descriptive expressions in a so-called "Greek" format and thus alienated them from Turkish.  With this crafty but rather evil discovery of theirs, they not only stole the Turkish, but also the Turanian religion, civilization and even the peoples!



Recent KSHATRIAS in A.D. time duration:


We have the following interesting and enlightening information about Kshatriyas from the author of the internet site at linkhttp://www.gurjari.net/ico/Mystica/html/khatriya.htm :


kshatriya"Kshatriya literally means "protector of gentle people". Second in the social hierarchy of the caste system (see Varna), the Kshatriyas were kings and warriors. They were said to have evolved from the arms ofBrahma, signifying that their role in society was the protection of people and livestock. The Hindus maintain that only a Kshatriya had the right to rule, though Brahmin rulers are not unknown. They were supposed to be brave and fearless, and to live and die by a code of honour and loyalty. They could eat meat and drink liquor and their most exalted death was to die in battle.

The Puranas say that Parashurama in his time destroyed all the men of the Kshatriya race. Since there was no one left to rule, anarchy prevailed. The Brahmins realised that a class of rulers was required. They held a sacrifice  near Mt. Abu (Rajasthan), and from the fire pit emerged four clans: the Parmars, Chauhans, Parihars and Solankis. These fire-born clans Agnikula) were called Rajputs. Therefore, according to the Puranas, other than these Rajputs, those presently known as Kshatriyas are progeny of Brahmins who had married Kshatriya women.

There are also leading Rajputs clans that claim descent from the sun and the moon and accordingly labeled themselves asSuryavanshi and Chandravanshi. One theory holds that in the 6th century AD, after the death of arshavardhana, the powerful ruler of Thaneshvara, there was a power vacuum in north India. To maintain the social order, the Brahmins legitimized clans of invading adventurers from Central Asia as Agnikula, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas."

The very fact that "the Brahmins legitimized clans of invading adventurers from Central Asia as Agnikula, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas"  is testimony that the ancient Kshatriyas of the Sun Empire and the Moon Empire of India were Central Asiatic Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. In this regard, see also my paper, at link,
http://www.polatkaya.net/Sun_Empire_of_Ancient_India.html After exterminating the original Turanian Kshatriyas, the Brahmins now asked these new waves of Central Asiatic Turanian peoples to govern and protect the people of ancient India because the religious Brahmin clergy (exploiters) did not know how to rule people with justice and nobility!  We note that, these Central Asiatic Turanians were also called AGNIKULA (meaning "Family of the Fire God", "fire-born clans" or the "Sun-God people"). Now let us understand the meaning of this term. 

The term AGNIKULA, rearranged as "GIN-CULA-A" or  "GUN-CILA-A",  is from the Turkish expression "GÜN KULU O"meaning "he is the loyal servant of the Sun". The sun worshipping Turanians were the royal servants of the Sun.  Since their kings also took the kingly personality of being the Sun-God, the kings' subjects regarded themselves as the loyal servants of the king as well.  

Turkish word GÜN means "sun" (which is the most magnificent fire of them all).  The Sanskrit term AGNI is made up from Turkish "gün" - also meaning "fire".   Turkish word KUL means "loyal servant" 

They were also called by the name Rajput.  The term Rajput is defined as "a member of a Hindu military caste claiming Kshatriya descent."  Although this term RAJPUT is thought to be from the Sanskrit term "
rājan" meaning "king" + "putra" meaning"son", [Oxford American Dictionaries], thus making them as "sons of Kings", actually, the source of the term RAJPUT is as follows: 

The name RAJPUT, rearranged as "PAJ-TUR", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BAŞ TUR" meaning "The Head Tur (man)", "The Top Tur (man)".  Secondly, the term means "he is head", "he is top". The "head man"of a country is its king. This definition describes them as the rulers and kings of India as the name Kshatriya means rulers and warriors.  By reformatting the Turkish term "BAŞ TUR" (BAŞTUR) into RAJPUT, the TUR/TURK/OGUZ identity of theKshatriya people has been obliterated.  Additionally this term BAŞTUR is also the term PAŞATUR meaning "He is the top General of the military". This makes perfect sense because 
the term Kshatriya also means "warrior".  Then the name so-calledRAJPUT, claimed to be "a member of a Hindu military caste claiming Kshatriya descent", is an altered form of the Turkish termPAŞATUR. This ties the so-called Hindu military RAJPUTs to the Turkish military - that is, the most ancient military organization of the world!

Similarly, the name
  RAJPUTANA, rearranged as "PAJ-TANRA-U", is the altered and restructured form of the Turkish expression "BAŞ TANRU O" (TEPE TANRI O) meaning "He is the Top God". Thus the king who acquires such titles associates himself with God. Additionally, it means the "Head is the God" which refers to the human head as being a creator god. 

The above reference saying that: "
They held a sacrifice  near Mt. Abu (Rajasthan), and from the fire pit emerged four clans: the Parmars, Chauhans, Parihars and Solankis. These fire-born clans Agnikula) were called Rajputs. Therefore, according to the Puranas, other than these Rajputs, those presently known as Kshatriyas are progeny of Brahmins who had married Kshatriya women"  implies that there was a genocide of the Kshatriya men by the Aryan Brahmin. 

The place name RAJASTHAN
, rearranged as "JAR-SHTAN-A", is the altered and restructured form of the Turkish expression"YER IŞITAN O"  meaning "it is that which lights up the earth", that is, "it is the sun".  Thus the "fire pit" mentioned in the above citing from which the four Kshatriya clans were borne, refers to the Sun country of those clans who were Sun God believers. 

Additionally, the name RAJASTHAN
, rearranged as "AS-AJ-TANRH", is the altered and restructured form of the Turkish expression "AS AY-TANRI " (BIR AY-TANRI) "  meaning "one Moon-God".  In this case, the reference is to the Moon-God of Turanians in Turkish.

Finally, the name RAJASTHAN
, rearranged as "AS-TANRH-AJ ", is the altered and restructured form of the Turkish expression"AS TANRI ÖY"  meaning "one house of God".  This refers to all of these Kshatriya peoples as "House of One GOD" but again in Turkish!



About the name RAJPUT:



"The Rajputs (from the Sanskrit tatpurusha compound rājaputra, "son of a king"), are a ruling class of the Indian subcontinentand south east Asia. In the Hindustani language, those belonging to the Kshatriya/Chattari Varna of Hindus are generally referred to as "Rajputs". They ruled in the Indian sub-continent from 6th century to 20th century and south east Asia from 9th to 15th centuries. Nepal was the last empire of Rajputs which ended in 1950. At the time of India's independence in 1947, Rajputs ruled in the "overwhelming majority" of the princely states of Rajasthan and Saurashtra, where the largest number of princely states were found.[1] Many Rajputs claim descent from Rama[2] and Krishna.[3] 

Let us understand the following names from this reference:

The name TATPURUSHA, rearranged as "TUR-PASHA
TU", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression 
PAŞATU meaning "He is the Tur (Turk) military general", "he is the Top Tur (man)".  This makes the Rajput as military men, warriors as Kshatriya people are said to be.  Turkish Generals (PAŞAS) are not only the rulers of an army unit, but quite frequently are the rulers of the country.  Thus, the decipherment of this Sanskrit term clearly admits that the Rajputs were Turkish military rulers.  

Additionally, the name TATPURUSHA, rearranged as "ATU-PASHTUR
", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "ADU PAŞTUR" meaning "his name is 'Head'".  Thus, the Rajputs are the top men as described by this Turkish expression!



a)    The name RAJAPUTRA, that is, another form of the name TATPURUSHA for Rajputs, rearranged as "AR-PAJATU
R", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "ER PAŞATUR" meaning "He is Hero General",  "He is warrior General" Thus both names of TATPURUSHA and RAJAPUTRA are different forms of the same concept but composed in Turkish. 

b)    Additionally, the name RAJAPUTRA, rearranged as "TUR-PAJA
-AR", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "TUR PAŞA ER meaning "Tur (Turk) top military man", "Turk General " 

c)    The name RAJAPUTRA, rearranged as "AR-PAJUTA
R", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "ERPAŞUTUR" meaning "is head of man" which refers both being the "ruling top man of men", "ruling top man of soldiers" and also to "head of man" which rules the people!



a)    The name RAJASTHAN, being a country name, rearranged as "
AJARSTHAN", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "AYERISTAN meaning "Moon-God-istan"; "Moon-God country". 

b)    The name RAJASTHAN, rearranged as "TANRA-JASH
", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression 
 or  "TANRI GÖZÜ" meaning "Face of God" or alternatively "Eye of God" respectively. Moon was regarded as one eye of the creator God among ancient Turanians.



a)    The name SAURASHTRA, another Rajput state in India, rearranged as 
"SARU-ASHATR", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "SARI IŞITUR meaning "it is yellow (golden) light" which refers to the light of the sun and also to the moonlight (sunlight reflected by the moon).   

b)    The name SAURASHTRA, rearranged as 
"TUR-ASHA-ARS", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression"TUR IŞI ERIZ meaning "we are enlightened Tur man".  This describes the Kshatria people as not only "light worshipping"people but also as learned people.  Corresponding to this Turanian concept, there is the Sanskrit term RISHI which is from Turkish"IŞI ER" meaning "enlightened man". 



What we observe here is that in this Kshatriya time period, the ancient Turanian religion, that is, the first and foremost Sun-God religion, gave way to a Moon-God religion installed by the manipulations of the Brahmin/Jehova clergy.  They say that a sun eclipse took place during the KURUKSHETRA war where the Kshatriyas were annhiliated.  This is secretly referred to as the "Eclipse of the Sun"  (Güneß Tutulmasi) - literally meaning that the Moon gets temporarily in front of the Sun (and having nothing to do with the Sun religion) - but metaphorically referring to the fact that this Brahmin clergy and their collaborators manipulated the extinction of the ancient Turanian Sun religion in the hearts and minds of people and installed a religion based on the Moon God - which was also a Turanian God! 

This kind of mythology has also been used in the so-called "crucifixion of Isa" implying that Isa was not a real person but rather a personification of the Moon - as Rama was also a personification of the moon.  Therefore, Moon believing came to be much more in fashion. But for the Turanians, this was not new, because since ancient times they were the Sky-God, Sun-God and  Moon-God believers. All of these decipherments of ancient names of the ruling peoples in ancient India make the ancient Indians as Central Asiatic Turkish peoples and most of the present Indian peoples as the descendants of the ancient Turkish peoples - although they have been Indo-Aryanized and converted to all kinds of different identities. 

But, whether there is a Sun eclipse, or, an eclipse of the Sun religion, that is, the sun religion is replaced with a Moon religion, the SUN is never really lost - no matter what man does artificially or deceptively or metaphorically, the Sun is still there and does what it does best to light up, heat up and give life to all the beings that have found life on earth!  The Sun (with its light and heat) is the most logical and perfect entity to be worshipped as a God - and this is what the ancient Turanians did.  In fact, the worshipping of any Sun (star) by the inhabitants of its local planets, would apply across the universe.  This makes the ancient Sun-worshipping Turanian OGUZ religion not only the first religion on earth - but also a universal religion!



The above reference states that the new Central Asians coming to India were called Parmars, Chauhans, Parimars and Solankis.  Let us now identify in Turkish these names that appear in this above reference citing.

1.    The name PARMARS:

This name is described in Wikipedia at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramara as:

"Paramara (also known as Parmara and Parmar and Panwar) is a Rajput, Yadav[1] and Gurjar[2][3] clan of India.
A section of the Paramaras formed a prominent ruling dynasty of medieval India, with their capital at Dhar, from the 9th century to the 14th century.[2] In modern times, the Paramaras are located throughout northern, western and central India. Paramaras are also spread throughout the nations of the former British Empire, particularly Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as in the USA and in Sindh, Pakistan, where they constitute 40% of the population of the Dadu district; here they are called Panhwars. The Ponwar clan of the Marathas, who ruled the states of Dewas, Dhar, Rajgarh in Malwa and Chhatarpur in Bundelkhand from the 18th century to the mid-20th century, claim the same descent as the Paramaras."

Thus, the descendants of these medieval Kshatriyas called Parmar, Paramara, Parmara and Gurjar Turanians are still in India, but they are mostly Indo-Aryanized.

a)    The name PARMARS, rearranged as "PAR-MA-RS", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR MA ERIZ" (BIR AY ERIZ)  meaning "We are the One-Moon Men".  As the story above states they claimed to be "descent from the sun and the moon", that is to say, they were Turanian Sun and Moon worshippers.  

b)    The name PARAMARA, rearranged as "PAR-MA-ARA", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR MA ERI" (BIR AY ERI)  again meaning "One-Moon Men".  As the story above states, they claimed "descent from the sun and the moon", that is to say, they were Turanian Sun and Moon worshippers, or, the children of the sun and the moon.

Turkish word MA (AY) means "moon" BIR means "one" ER means "man; soldier; hero; husband" 



2.    The name CHAUHANS:


"Chohan, Chohhan, Chauhan or Chouhan (Punjabi: ਚੌਹਾਨ, Hindi: चौहान) - A              gotra  (lineage) found among the Jats,[2]Rajputs,[3] and Gurjars.[4] Chauhan is a clan who ruled parts of northern India in the Middle Ages. Chauhan are famous for Maharaja Prithviraj Chauhan, who defeated Mohammad Ghori in the First Battle of Tarain, Ghori was captured in this battle but his life was spared by Maharaja Prithviraj Chauhan. However, in another invasion, Ghori was able to defeat the Chauhan king in the second battle also fought in the plains of Tarain. "

These so-called 
"Chohan, Chohhan, Chauhan or Chouhan" peoples are very much the GÖYHAN (GÖKHAN, GÖKTÜRK)Turkish tribes of Central Asia. It is said that they were descended from someone named DHUNDHAR which is an altered form of the Turkish name "DÜNDAR".  Although the name DÜNDAR is a man's name in Turkish, the  Indo-Aryanized name ofDHUNDHAR, rearranged as "DUR-HANDH", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "TURHANDI"meaning "he is Tur Lord", "he is Turk Lord".  This again identifies them as Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Evidently their Turkish identity has been disguised!  TURHAN is also a very widely used Turkish name for a man. 

Even the name GOTRA, stated as being the lineage of 
Chouhan, rearranged as "TORG-A", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "TÖRK O" (TÜRK O, TÜRK SOYUNDAN) meaning "he is Turk", "his lineage is Turk".  In view of all these hidden but deciphered information, let us understand the name Chauhan or Chouhan. 

The name CHAUHANS (CHOUHANS), rearranged as "CHOU-HAN-S", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "GÖY-HAN-IZ" (GÖK HAN-IZ) meaning "We are the Sky Lords".  The Turkish name GÖKHAN was the name of one of the six sons of OGUZ KAGAN.  Similarly named are the GÖK TÜRKS of the Gök Turk Empire of Central Asia.GÖKHAN was the name of one of the six sons of OGUZ KAGAN. 

Interestingly, when the name CHAUHANS (CHOUHANS) is rearranged as "OCHUS-HAN", what we get is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "OGUZ HAN" meaning "Lord OGUZ" who is the father of GÖKHAN in the TurkishOGUZ KAGAN epic story. The name Oguz, in addition to being the ancestor name of Turkish peoples, was also a name of the Sky-God, Sun-God and the Moon-God in Turkish. 

From all of this we see that the Turkish Oguz Kagan Epic is not just "mythology" but rather embellished historical story!

At this point I will note that the English plurality suffix -S or -ES is the altered form of the Turkish plurality suffix  -IZ, iZ, -UZ, -ÜZ  verbal suffix for the first person plural case.   That is why the English word "KHANS" meaning "lords" is nothing but the Turkish word "HANIZ" meaning "we are lords". Thus the source of this so-called "English" plurality suffix is again from Turkish - contrary to any other etymology given for it. 

The term KHAN is defined as "a title given to rulers and officials in central Asia, Afghanistan, and certain other Muslim countries. Any of the successors of Genghis Khan, supreme rulers of the Turkish, Tartar, and Mongol peoples and emperors of China in the Middle Ages". [Oxford American Dictionaries].  

It should be noted that the Turkish word HAN (KHAN) was in use in Turkish far earlier than the name GENGIZ KHAN (CENGIZ HAN).  So this title does not start with Gengiz Khan as mentioned in the above definition of the Oxford American Dictionaries.  This deceptive definition gives the wrong impression that this Turkish title is a "recent" one which is contrary to the facts! This Turkish title is also the root of the so-called Semitic name "NOAH".  The so-called "Semitic" name NOAH is nothing but the altered form of the Turkish expression "HAN O" meaning "He is Lord". Of course, in this context, it is the name of the Sky-God and Man the god Similarly, the name HAN in the  "HAN DYNASTY" of China is nothing but the Turkish word "HAN" The ancient Turanians have been in the geography that is presently called China for a much longer time than is admitted.  Curiously such linguistic deceptions have been designed to mislead the public.  Additionally, they have been used to blacken (and thus make invisible) any names related to the Turks or to ancient Turkish history.  It should be noted that the term "TURKISH" does not only apply to the Turks of Anatolia but also to the Turks all over the world!



3.    The name PARIHARS:

The name is explained in Wikipedia link at url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parihar_Meenas  as follows:

"Parihar or Pratihar Meenas is one of the sub group of Meenas. They are mainly found in the region of Bundi city. They were initial builder of Bundi and Bundi is named after the King Bandu Meena. In ancient time Bundi was called “Bandu-Ka-Nal", Nal means “narrow ways” and later the region is governed by Rao Deva Hara. He took over Bundi from Jaita Meena in 1342 and he renamed the whole area as Haravati or Haroti."

a)    The name BANDU-KA-NAL, being the name the Bundi city, rearranged as "BAN-U-AL-KAND", is the altered form of Turkish word "BEN O 'AL KAND'" (BEN O 'AL KENT') meaning "I am that 'Red City'".  This definition in Turkish indicates that the city name was Turkish "AL KENT" and it was built after the Sun-God. We have the name KAND (KENT), meaning "city", also in the name of the ancient Central Asian city of "SAMERKAND".  Wikipedia, at urlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samarkand, writes  about  the city of Samarkand as being "one of the oldest inhabited cities in the world, prospering from its location on the trade route between China and the Mediterranean (Silk Road). At times Samarkand has been one of the greatest cities of Central Asia."  I believe the name of this Turanian city comes from the ancient name of"SUMER-KENT" meaning "the Sumer City", indicating that the ancient city was either built by the Tuaranian Sumers or after their name by other Turanians. After all, the Sumerians were Turanians and Central Asians who migrated to Irak in ancient times. 

b)    Alternatively, the name BANDU-KA-NAL, rearranged as "BAN-AL-KUNDA", is the altered form of Turkish word "BEN 'AL KÜNDÜ'" meaning "I am 'Red Sun'".  This definition in Turkish explains not only the godly title of the King BANDU MEENA by means of which he claimes himself the Sun God deity, but also it indicates that the city he built was named after the Sun-God.  Kshatriyas were sun-worshipping Turanians.

c)    Even the name MEENAS in the sub group name PRATIHAR MEENAS , rearranged a "MEN -AS", is the altered form of Turkish word "MEN AS" (MANAS) meaning "I am One", "I am single". This descriptive adjective in Turkish refers to the God  Turanians in one hand, and also to this Parihar group of Central Asians. The name MANAS is also the name of the famed MANAS epic  of the Kirgiz Turks. Similarly the name MINOS (i.e., "MEN-AS, MEN-US, MEN-OZ (MEN OGUZ)) Minoan civilization in the Aegean Sea (some 1500 B,C, or earlier) also identifies with this name!  I should also note that the so-called English term"MONASTERY" is also derived from this Turkish word "MANAS" or "MEN AS".

The Greek term "monas" meaning "unit, one", is nothing but the Turkish "MEN AS" (MANAS) meaning "I am One", "I am single" The term "monastery' is defined as  "a community of persons, esp. monks or nuns, living under religious vows" and "the place of residence occupied by such persons."  The term MONASTERY, rearranged as "MEN-AS-R-OYT", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "MEN AS ER ÖYTÜ" meaning "I am the house of One-Man", "I am the house of God" or "I am the house of God believers". Thus not only the linguistic source is Turkish but also the religious concept is Turkish!  

Additionally, the term MONASTERY, rearranged as "MEN-OST-YAR", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "MEN ÜST YER" meaning "I am the the top place". The so-called "Greek" SEMELE Monastery in Turkey is one such place built into high cliffs.

d)    The name PARIHARS, rearranged as "PIR-AHA-RS", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR AGA ERIZ"  meaning "We are One-Lord Men", "we are noble men".  This Turkish definition describes this group as One Sky-God worshipping people as all Turanians were.  The term "One-Lord", (i.e., BIR AGA in Turkish), in one meaning, refers to "One Sky God" and in the second, refers to the PARIHARS as being the "lord" peoples. As rulers and warriors, they were so.  

The above reference states that 
"the region of Bundi city was later governed by Rao Deva Hara. He took over Bundi from Jaita Meena in 1342 and he renamed the whole area as Haravati or Haroti."   The name  "RAO DEVA HARA" is the Aryanized form of the Turkish title "O ER KARA DEV" meaning "that man is the Black Giant (monster)".  It is no wonder that he changed the older city name so-called BANDU-KA-NAL, that is, "AL KAND" (AL KENT) in Turkish, to Haravati or Haroti.   The nameHARAVATI, is the restructured form of the Turkish name "KARA EVDI" meaning "it is Black House", and alternatively, in the form of Turkish "KARA EVIDI", it means "it is House of Kara" Thus, the name HARAVATI is after the name HARA (i.e.,"KARA" in Turkish). 



Central Asiatic Gurjars:

The Parihars or Pratihar Meenas are also identified with the Central Asiatic Gurjars. We have the following information from Wikipedia at link:  


Gurjar is the name of an Indian community or ethnic group with several theories about its origin. According to one theory, the Gurjars came to India from Central Asia[6], while according to another view, they were locals who lived in obscurity before their rise on the political stage of India.[7]

The word "Pratihara" means keeper or protector, and was used by the Gurjara-Pratihara rulers as self-designation. The Pratihara rulers claim descent from the Hindu mythological character Lakshmana, who had performed the duty of a door-keeper ("pratihara") for his elder brother Rama. However, the author Sailendra Nath Sen believes that the title "Pratihara" is derived from one of the kings in the line holding the office of a Pratihara ("protector") in the Rashtrakuta court.[8]

A 1966 book published by the Directorate of Public Relations of Rajasthan mentions that the kings of this dynasty came to be known as the Pratiharas, because they guarded the north-western borders of the Indian subcontinent against foreign invasions.[9]  

In view of this reference, let us analyse these names:

a)    The name GURJARA, rearranged letter-by-letter as "UJGAR-AR", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "UYGUR ERi"  meaning "Uigur man", "Uygur (Uyghur) Turks".  This definition in Turkish clearly identifiesGURJARA people with the Uyghur Turks.  This also verifies the statement that "Gurjars came to India from Central Asia".  Eastern Turkistan, presently called the "
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region" of the People's Republic of China, is the original homelands of the Uyghur Turks. [See link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang]. The Turanian Uyghur Turks were one of the earliest and most celebrated groups in ancient India.  Their civilization was renowned.

b)   The Gurjara-Pratihara rulers called themselves as "Pratihara" meaning "keeper or protector" The name PRATIHARAS, rearranged as "PIR-ATA-ARHS", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR ATA ERIZ" meaning "we are One-Father man".  These Gurjara-Pratihara rulers, who regard themselves as "One Father man", surely regard the people as their own family and are morally required to be the "protector" rulers of the peoples they rule, as they are the protectors of their own immediate families.  This Turkish definition also identifies the so-called Gurjara  (i.e., "Uighur" Turks) as "ancestor" people.  Furthermore, this definition associates the rulers with the One-Sky-Father-God concept since the ancient Turanian rulers also regarded themselves as personification of God. Ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples were "One Sky-God" worshippingpeople.  So the Gurjara-Pratihara were Turanian and central Asiatic people.

Turkish word ATA means "father, ancestor", ER means "man; husband; soldier; hero", BIR means "one". 

c)    Additionally, the composite term GURJARA-PRATIHARA, meaning "keeper or protector", rearranged letter-by-letter as"PIR-GARUJAR-ATA-ARH", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR GORUYOR ATA ERI" (BIR KORUYOR ATA ERI)  meaning "one protector father man".  By these definitions, the so-called GURJAR people (i.e., theUIGUR (UYGUR / UYGHUR Turks), who came from central Asia to India, fit the definitions given in the above references.  They called themselves "one protector father man" which is the meaning attributed to them in the above given reference citing.  

In the Sanskrit saying in the reference above, although, the meaning "protector" is attributed to the word  PRATIHARA, actually this meaning is embedded in the name GURJARA as this name has the Turkish word "GORUR" or 
"GORUYAR" meaning"protects" embedded in it. As a result of reformatting the original Turkish text by the writers of the Indianized forms of the historical information, the "protector" aspect has been reasigned to the newly structured word PRATIHARA. This is expected because in manufacturing words for the "Indo-European" languages from Turkish, this kind of assignment of meanings to words linguistically unrelated to the meaning was a common practice. 

d)    This is also verified by the saying that "The Pratihara rulers claimed descent from the Hindu mythological characterLAKSHMANA" who had performed the duty of a door-keeper ("pratihara") for his elder brother Rama. The term RAMA is the personification of the Moon. In this context, the name LAKSHMANA, rearranged letter-by-letter as "MAN-AL-SHAK", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "MEN AL IŞIK"  meaning "I am Red-Light", "I am sunlight" 

Mythologically, the sunlight is indeed a "door keeper" of the moon because it continuously shines on it (like a lamp at a gate).  Additionally, this definition clearly identifies the GURJARA people, that is, the "Uigur Turks" with the sun and moon worshipping. Furthermore, with this definition in Turkish, the Uigur (i.e., the so-called "GURJAR") kings also identified themselves as the Red (golden) Sun-God, that is,  "AL IŞIK TANRI" in Turkish . 

Another reference citing also states that Gurjara kings (i.e., "Uyghur" Turks) ruled the 
The Rashtrakuta Empire that covered large parts of southern, central and northern parts of India.  About the name RASHTRAKUTA , the Wikipedia at linkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtrakuta_Dynasty gives the following information:

"The Rashtrakuta Empire (Kannada: ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರಕೂಟ) was a                          royal dynasty ruling large parts of southern, central and northern India between the sixth and the 10th centuries. During this period they ruled as several closely related, but individualclans. The earliest known Rashtrakuta inscription is a 7th century copper plate grant that mentions their rule from Manpur in the Malwa region of modern Madhya Pradesh. Other ruling Rashtrakuta clans from the same period mentioned in inscriptions were the kings of Achalapur which is modern Elichpur in Maharashtra and the rulers of Kannauj. Several controversies exist regarding the origin of these early Rashtrakutas, their native home and their language."


 (Hindi: कन्नौज, Urdu: کنوج), also spelt Kanauj, is a city, administrative headquarters and a municipal board orNagar Palika Parishad in Kannauj district in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. The city's name is traditionally derived from the term Kanyakubja[1] (maiden's womb). Kannauj is an ancient city, in earlier times the capital of Emperor Harshavardhan. It is said that Kanyakubja Brahmin's are originally from Kannauj. Kannauj is known for the distilling of scents and is a market center for tobacco, perfume, and rose water. It has given its name to a distinct dialect of the Hindi language known as Kanauji."

The first reference says that: "Several controversies exist regarding the origin of these early Rashtrakutas, their native home and their language."

e)    The name RASHTRAKUTA, rearranged as "TURKSHATAR-A", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "TÜRKŞÜTÜR O" (TÜRKÇÜTÜR O)  meaning "He is from Turkish people", "They are Turkish people".  Additionally, it is the Turkish expression "TÜRKŞETÜR O" (TÜRKÇETÜR O)   meaning "their language is Turkish" which again verifies that they were Turkish peoples ruling large parts of southern, central and northern India. These Turkish definitions again identify the RASHTRAKUTA empire as an empire of Turkish peoples in India starting from the sixth century onwards to the tenth centuries. This make a large segment of the present Indian population as descendants of the ancient Turkish peoples. 

This decipherment of the name RASHTRAKUTA  indicates that they were Turanian Turkish peoples and also their language was Turkish.  This then removes any doubt that may exist in the minds of scholars about them and their language. 

Even the name KSHATRIYA is embedded in the name RASHTRAKUTA indicating that the people of the  RASHTRAKUTAEmpire were also the so-called "KSHATRIYA" Turks.   This we can see when the name  RASHTRAKUTA is rearranged as"KSHATRAATUR ", we find that it is the altered form of Turkish word "KSHATRIYA'TUR'" meaning "it is 'Ksahatriya".  In this case the name KSHATRIYA is a proper name although it is not a Turkish name.

f)    The city name KANNAUJ, rearranged as "KANUNJA", is from Turkish word "KANUNCU"  meaning "law maker".  As the reference indicates this ancient city of India was an "administrative 
headquarters and a place of municipal board" which makes the city a "law making city", that is,  KANUNCU. Turkish word KANUN means "law" , hence, the name of this city is coined after the Turkish word KANUN. Thus, the source of the city name so-called "KANNAUJ" is from Turkish - contrary to the bogus claim that the city's name is derived from the term Kanyakubja (maiden's womb). 

g)    The city name KANNAUJ, rearranged as "KUNAJ-AN", is from Turkish word "KUNAS-hANa" (GÜNES EVI)  meaning"the house of Sun" Thus, again the source of the city name is from Turkish and has been named after the Sun-God rather than from 
the term Kanyakubja (maiden's womb).  

It was normal for these Turanian people, being Kshatriyas (also known as Suryavanshas), who worshipped the Sun God, to name  their capital cities after the Sun or the Sun God.  And this is what my above decipherments are showing.




The name of the Emperor HARSHAVARDHAN is also very enlightening as we shall see below: 

a)    The  name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "ARSH-DANRH-AHA-V", is from the Turkish expression "ARŞ TANRI AGA O"  meaning "He is the Lord Sky-God", "He is the Sky-God believing Lord".  With this title in Turkish, he declares himself as the Sky-God, and also "a Sky-God believing lord". Such kingly titles were totally of the ancient Turanian civilization!

b)    The  name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "HSHAR-DANRA-AVH", is from the Turkish expression "IŞIR TANRI EVI"  meaning "The House of the Shining God", "The House of the Sun-God".  With this kingly title, he identifies his house as the House of the Sun-God!  All Kshatria Dynasties were Suryavansha Dynasties and therefore their houses were the Shining Sun Dynasties. 

c)    The name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "AVSHAR-AR-HAN-DH", is from the Turkish expression "AVŞAR ER HAN'DI"  meaning "He is the warrior Lord of Avshar (Turks)".  With this kingly title, He states the AVŞAR name of his Turkish clan name (i.e., "Türk Boyu" in Turkish)!

d)    The name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "AVSHAR-ARHAN-DH", is from the Turkish expression "AVŞAR ERHAN'DI"  meaning "He is Avshar ERHAN".  With this definition, he states his name in Turkish being ERHAN which is a widely used name for man. 

e)   The name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "A-DARVHSH-ARHAN", is from the Turkish expression "O DERVIŞ ERHAN"  meaning "he is the modest Erhan with the heart of an emperor".  With this definition, he states his nickname as "Dervish Erhan"  although he was an Emperor Erhan!  I would like to point out that the name "Darius" the Great, of the Mede Empire, also comes from this Turkish-Iranian name "Dervish".

f)    The city 
Kannauj is said to be an ancient city and in earlier times, it was the capital of Emperor HARSHAVARDHAN. In this context, the  name HARSHAVARDHAN, rearranged as "HSHA-VARD-AR-HAN", is from Turkish word "IŞI VERDI ER HAN"  meaning "The Lord Man who gave light", "The Lord Man who enlightened".  In this decipherment, with these meanings in Turkish, the so called King HARSHAVARDHAN is seen to have a kingly title in Turkish.  In the first one, he declares himself as the "Sun" as all kings did, and in the second, he claims himself as a learned person and with that he enlightened his people. 




These definitions clearly identify the so-called RASHTRAKUTA group as Turkish speaking Turks, and also as One Sky-God and Sun-God  worshipping people - as all Turanians were.  Evidently, the royal dynasty of the Turks ruled all over the Indian subcontinent (Hindustan) for a very long time.  It is no wonder that some writers such as Col. James Churchword identified Ancient India with the Turkish Uygur peoples, although he associates the Uyghur Turks with a "Lost Continent Mu".  Actually it was not a lost continent or  a continent submerged into the ocean that obliterated the civilization of the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples, but rather, it was some "religious clergy groups" whose main traditions were: sorcery; deception; lying; sophistry; stealing anything and everything including the Turanian language, religion, God and godly concepts; mischiefmaking; malice; intrigue; duplicity; instigation; causing disorder; rebellion; inciting people to kill each other; money and land hoarding; usury; exploitation; and, the control of people.  Thus being "godly" was not the real purpose of these "religious clergy groups".  Rather, they used a "godly" appearance as a curtain while doing all kinds of evil secretly behind that curtain. By deceptively stealing the Turanian language to manufacture all kinds of languages, and similarly concocting artificial religions to replace the Turanian religion, and by altering the names of these ancient Turanians, they obliterated that very ancient civilization of Turanian Uyghur and other Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples!  And this obliteration of the ancient Turanian civilization is what is being referred to as the "lost ancient civilization of a submerged continent".  This is a metaphorical coverup.  After all, it is really hard to believe that a continent was submerged under water and became "lost" - without leaving any trace of itself or its civilization.

For Uyghur  Turks' civilization see the following internet links:

1.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ihoz9WcbPw
2    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0VwTnlkHWo&feature=related
3.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ihoz9WcbPw&feature=related
4.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BbAQQs5JKo&feature=related
5.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_dlMV3Absw&feature=related



Wikipedia also gives the following:

"According to a legend given in later manuscripts of Prithviraj Raso, the Pratiharas were one of the Agnikula clans of Rajputs, deriving their origin from a sacrificial fire-pit (agnikunda) at Mount Abu.[10] However, this mythical story of Agnikula is not mentioned at all in the original version of the Prithviraj Raso preserved in the Fort Library at Bikaner.[11] Several scholars including D B Bhandarkar, Baij Nath Puri and A. F. Rudolf Hoernle believe that the Pratiharas were a branch of Gurjars.[12][13][14][15][16][17] The Pratihara dynasty is referred to as Gurjara pratiharanvayah, i.e., Pratihara clan of the Gurjaras, in line 4 of the "Rajor inscription (Alwar)".[18][19] The historian Rama Shankar Tripathi states that the Rajor inscription confirms theGurjara origin of the Pratiharas. In line 12 of this inscription, occur words which have been translated as "together with all the neighbouring fields cultivated by the Gurjaras". Here, the cultivators themselves are clearly called Gurjaras and therefore it's reasonable to presume that, in line four too, the term bears a racial signification.[20] 

h)    Additionally, 
The Pratihara dynasty is referred to as Gurjara pratiharanvayah, i.e., Pratihara clan of the GURJARAS 

The name 
PRATIHARANVAYAH, rearranged as "PIR-HAVA-TANRA-AYH", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "BIR HAVA TANRI ÖYÜ"  (BIR GÖK TANRI EVI) meaning "House of One-Sky-God" and/or "One House of Sky-God" This Turkish expression identifies the so-called Parihar or Pratihar people with the Turkish GÖK TANRI, that is, the Sky-God of ancient Turanians.  Their name is Indianized as Gurjaras people from Central Asia, that is, the UYGURTurks. This revelation also identifies the state of GURJARAT in India with the Uygur name although name has been intentionally Aryanized.  This we see as follows: 

The name GURJARAT, as a country, rearranged as "UJGAR-ART", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression"UYGUR  YERIDI" meaning "it is the place of Uigur", "it is the land of Uigur".  This again identifies the Uigur Turks with the state of GURJARAT. 

the name GURJARAT, as name of people, rearranged as "UJGAR-ART", is the altered and reformatted form of the Turkish expression "UYGUR  ERIDI" meaning "it is the Uigur people" 

Thus the composite term 
Gurjara pratiharanvayah becomes "BIR-HAVA-TANRI UYGUR ERI ÖYÜ" (BIR-GÖK-TANRIUYGUR ERI ÖYÜ) meaning "the House of One-Sky-God believing Uigur Man". 

Turkish word  
BIR means "one", HAVA means "air; sky", TANRI means "God", ER means "man; soldier; hero; husband; protector", ÖY (EV) means "house, dynasty; land; country", BIR means "one", BIR means "one", BIR means "one", BIRmeans "one", 

Thus, all the Turanian Kshatriya peoples (i.e., Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples) in ancient Hindustan were Indo-Aryanized, and their Turkishness were made to be forgotten or were intentionally obliterated!  This was an intentional usurpation as well as obliteration long term projects of Aryans and the Semites against the Turanians all over the world.  Unsuspecting Turanians always gave protection to these wanderer peoples who first infiltrated into the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz communities where they were well received and protected.  But these "Black" and "Wind" believing peoples always struck the Turanians from within together with their collaborators outside the targetted community.  

This very same tactic was also used in ancient Turanian country presently called "Iran" where the money and land hoarders of Iran, that is, the the Aryans and the Semites, collaborated together in a revolt planned and perpetrated against the Turkish MEDE Empire of Iran.  In the uprising, the Mede empire was toppled and an Aryan and Semite, so-called, "ACHEMENIDE" Dynasty wasestablished in the mid first millennium B.C.  This way they were able to usurp the giant Turkish MEDE empire in one deceitful usurpation act.   This Aryan and Semite tactic was used against the native Turanians of Europe and Anatolia during the Roman and Byzantium Empires and by the Semite Assurians in the Middle East and so-called Egypt.



We have the following additional information about the "Gurjar" (Uyghur) peoples from Wikipedia link at



Modern-day Gujarat is derived from Gurjaratra that is the land protected or ruled by the Gurjars, or from Gurjar-Rashtra, theGujjar nation.[7][8][9] The origins of the Gujjars are uncertain. The Gujjar clan appeared in northern India about the time of the Huna invasions of northern India. The name of the tribe was Sanskritized to "Gurjara".[10] The Gurjars/Gujjars believe to have descended from Suryavanshi Kshatriyas (Sun Dynasty).[11] Historically, the Gurjars were Sun-worshipers and their copper-plate grants and seals also bear an emblem of the Sun.[12]"

Here again we have to decipher some names that are all related to the name of GURJAR, that is, the UIGUR Turks:

a)    The name  GURJARAS, rearranged as "UJGAR-ARS", is from the Turkish expression "UYGUR ERiZ"  meaning "We are Uigur Men" 

b)    The name  GURJARATRA, as land protected or ruled by Gurjars - the Uigur Turks, rearranged as  "UJGAR-AR-ART", is from the Turkish expression "UIGUR ER YERITI"  meaning "it is place of Uigur man".

c)    Additionally, the name  GURJARATRA, as a place name, rearranged as "TURG-AR-JARA", is from the Turkish expression"TÜRK ER YERI"  meaning "place of Turk man". Thus, item b) and c) identify the names Uigur and Turk with each other despite the camouflage.

d)    The modern name  GUJARAT, (derived from the name GURJARATRA described above), rearranged as "TURG-AJA", is from the Turkish expression "TURK ÖYÜ"  meaning "house of Turk".  Thus, the people of the modern Gujarat are the Indo-Aryanized descendants of Uigur Turks. and hence of the Turks!

d)    The name 
 GURJAR-RASHTRA, meaning the Gujjar nation, the origins of whom are said to be uncertain, rearranged as"GUJ-SHA-ARRARTAR", is from the Turkish expression "GÖYIŞI ERLERDIR" (GÜNEŞ ERLERDIR)  meaning "they are Sky-Light men", "they are Sunlight men", "they are sun-god believing men" 

Furthermore, the decipherment being in the form of "GUJSHA-ARRARTAR", is from the Turkish expression "GÖYÇÜ ERLERDIR"  meaning "they are sky believing men" Evidently, these long Turkish expressions have been shortened to the form of GUJJAR.  This we see when the name GUJJAR is rearranged as "GUJJA-R", and read as a Turkish expression.  It is found to be an altered form of the Turkish expression "GÖYJÜ eR" (GÖYCÜ eR, GÖKCÜ eR) meaning "sky believing man".   Thus the meanings of these two decipherments in Turkish corroborate each other and show that both words are from Turkish!



4.    The fourth group of late coming Kshatriyas from Central Asia is named as SOLANKIS:

The SOLANKIS were one of the Agnikula groups called 
the Parmars, Chauhans, Parihars and Solankis. I explained the first three groups in detail above. Now lest us identify the name Solankis. 

a)    The name 
 SOLANKI, rearranged as "AL-KONIS", is from the Turkish expression "AL GÜNEŞ" meaning "Red Sun". So, their name refers to the name of the Sun in Turkish indicating that they are sun believers. 

b)    The name  SOLANKI, rearranged as "ALKONIS", is from the Turkish expression "ALGÜNIZ" meaning "we are Algun". So, their Turkish name was ALGÜN meaning "red sun" 

c)    The name  SOLANKI, rearranged as "KONAS-IL", is from the Turkish expression "GÜNEŞ ILI" meaning "Sun Country". Thus, this definition identifies their original country in Central Asia and their new country in India (which was also known as Suryavansha - that is, the Sun Empire) as the "Sun country".  They were originally from Central Asia, that is, to say "TURKISTAN".  This explains why the so-called "Solankis", that is, "ALGUNs", called their country "GUNES ILI", that is, "Sun Country". 

d)    The name  SOLANKI, rearranged as "ASIL-KON", is from the Turkish expression "ASIL GÜN" meaning "Noble Sun". This makes the Solanki people "the noble Sun people".

e)    The name 
 SOLANKI, rearranged as "KONASLI", is from the Turkish expression "GÜNEŞLI" meaning "Sunny".  This again identifies the so-called SOLANKI people with the Sun in Turkish!



Additionally, we have the following additional information about the "Solanki" people from Wikipedia link at

The Solanki (Gujari:ंकी     (Devanagari)) are a Hindu Agnivanshi Rajput clan of Gurjar[1] stock who ruled parts of western and central India between the 10th and 13th centuries. Solankis are descended from 6th Century Badami Chalukyas[2]. The name Solanki comes from Chalukya the ancient Indian dynasty. During 543–566, Pulakesi I, established the kingdom at Vatapi (present-day Badami, Bagalkot District in North Karnataka of Karnataka).[3] The Solanki clan-name is found within the Rajput and Gurjar[4] community of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. Yaduvanshi Ahirs also have a Gotra named Solangi, which they believe is other form of Solanki.[5]

In Gujarat, Anhilwara (modern Siddhpur Patan) served as their capital. Gujarat was a major center of Indian Ocean trade, andAnhilwara was one of the largest cities in India, with population estimated at 100,000 in the year 1000. The Solankis were patrons of the great seaside temple of Shiva at Somnath Patan in Kathiawar; Bhima Dev helped rebuild the temple after it was sacked by Mahmud of Ghazni in 1026. His son, Karandev, conquered the Bhil king Ashapall or Ashaval, and after his victory established a city named Karnavati on the banks of the Sabarmati River, at the site of modern Ahmedabad.


Descendants of the Anhilwara Solankis ruled the state of Rewa, in the Bagelkhand region, the eastern part of present-day Madhya Pradesh. Vyaghra Deo, brother of the King of Gujarat, moved to Bagelkhand in the middle of the twelfth century, and obtained the fortress of Marpha, 18 miles northeast of Kalinjar. His son Karandeo married a Kalchuri (Haihaya) princess of Mandla, and received the fortress of Bandogarh as her dowry. Bandogarh served as the seat of the Solankis of Bagelkhand until its destruction by the Mughal emperor Akbar in 1597. After the destruction of Bandogargh, the Solankis moved their capital to Rewa. From 1812 to 1947 the Solanki, Maharajas of Rewa ruled the princely state of that name, within British India. In 1947, the last Maharaja of Rewa acceded to newly-independent India.

The city name of the BAGELKHAND region, rearranged as "EL-BAGH-KAND", is from the Turkish expression "ELBEYI KENT" (ILBEYI KENT) meaning "City of the Lord of Country", "City of the King" 

Turkish word ELBEYI means "lord of country", that is, "the King of country" ELBEYI is also a name for man in Turkish. 

The name VYAGHRA DEO, the 
brother of the King of Gujarat, rearranged as "VYGOR-AHA-DE", is the restructured form of the Turkish expression "UYGUR AGA'DI" meaning "He is Uyghur Lord".  This again verifies that Gujarat people were Uyghur Turks. So, this Uyghur King UYGUR AGA, identified by the Indo-Aryanized name of VYAGHRA DEO, moved toBAGELKHAND (i.e., "ELBEYI KENT" (ILBEYI KENT) in Turkish) in the middle of the twelfth century, and obtained the fortress of MARPHA.

The name KARANDEO, son of Uyghur Aga, rearranged as "KOR-ANDE-O", is from the Turkish expression "KOR AN'DI O"meaning "He is the Fire of the sky", that is, "The Sun of Sky".  This title deifies him as the Sun-God. 

Additionally, the name KARANDEO, rearranged as "ADE-KORAN", is from the Turkish expression "ADI KORAN" meaning"His  name is Koran (Korhan)". This identifies  first given name of this king as KORHAN  which is a name for men in Turkish.   The name means "Fire Lord" in Turkish. We must note here that even the name "UYGOR" read as "UY-GOR" means "House of Fire" which is again in accordance with the Sun-God believing!

The Mughal emperor Akbar was also a Turkish ruler in India.  Even the name MAHARAJA, rearranged as "MAH-AR-AJA",  is from Turkish expression 
"MA ER EÇE" meaning "Great Man of Moon". Thus, even this Indian name is from Turkish.  Turkish word "MA (MAH, AY) is another word for "moon".  Turkish word ER means "man. soldier, hero; husband" EÇE means"great" used to describe both "man" or "woman" who is the head of the family.




"Historical evidence suggests that the area around Ahmedabad has been inhabited since the 11th century, when it was known as Ashapalli or Ashaval.[9] At that time, Karandev I, the Solanki ruler of Anhilwara (modern Patan), waged a successful war against the Bhil king of Ashaval,[10] and established a city called Karnavati located at the present time area of Maninagar close to the river Sabarmati. Solanki rule lasted until the 13th century, when Gujarat came under the control of the Vaghela dynasty ofDholka and Karnavati was conquered by the Sultanate of Delhi. In 1411, the rule of the Muzaffarid dynasty was established in Gujarat. According to legend, Sultan Ahmed Shah, while camping on the banks of the River Sabarmati, saw a hare chasing a dog. Impressed by this act of bravery, the Sultan, who had been looking for a place to build his new capital, decided to locate the capital at this forest area close by to Karnavati right on the river bank and christened it Ahmedabad.[11] The incident is popularly described in a one liner saying "Jab kutte pe sassa aaya, tab Badshah ne shaher basaya". Translation: Seeing the hare chasing the dog, the Emperor built the City."

Linguistically, it is interesting to compare the last part of this sentence "tab Badshah ne shaher basaya" with the corresponding Turkish sentence "PADIŞAH YAPTI 
ŞAH-yERINI (ŞEHERINI) BAŞ ÖYÜ (BAŞ KENT)".   The corresponding words are as follows:

TAB  vs. Turkish YAPTI meaning "made, built";
BADSHAH  vs. Turkish PADIŞAH (which is from ancient Turkish "APA IŞIH / IŞIK", that is "Father Sun");
SHAHER  vs. Turkish "ŞAH YER" meaning "place of the King", more correctly, "place of the Sun man";

NE SHAHER vs. Turkish ŞAH-yERINI (ŞEHERINI)  meaning "his city";
PASAYA  vs.  Turkish 
BAŞ ÖYÜ (BAŞ KENT) meaning "the head House", that is, the "capital city". 

As can be seen from this comparison, the so-called "Hindo" language spoken in Gujarat is very much a restructured form of Turkish.

The modern name AHMEDABAD, the capital city of Gujarat, is actually a name made up from the Turkish expression "AHMED EVDI" (AHMED EVIDI) meaning "it is the house of Ahmed".  The name Ahmed is a widely used Turkish name for men.  Thus, the suffix "-ABAD" is an altered, restructured and Aryanized (Persianized) form of the Turkish word "EVDI" meaning "it is the house" 

This we see also in the city name KARNAVATI.  Here, the suffix "VATI" is again a restructured form of the Turkish word"EVDI" 

Another form of this Turkish word is the Jewish word "BETH" which is a distortion of the Turkish word "EVDI" (EVTI) meaning"it is house".  For example the so-called Jewish term "BETH ELOHIM" means "House of Jewish god".  But that Jewish God"ELOHIM" is actually made up from the Turkish expression "YEL AHaM" (YEL AGAM) meaning "my WIND Lord".  This clearly explains what "God" concept the Jewish people are believing in, although they have not disclosed it at all!  Of course the term"ELOHIM" is another substitution for the ancient Sumerian Storm God ENLIL which is the Turkish "HAN YEL" meaning"Lord wind"!  The modern name of this "BETH ELOHIM" is the city named BETHLEHEM - which again means "the house of the wind Lord".


"Leading Rajput clans claimed descent from the sun and the moon and accordingly labeled themselves as Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi. One theory holds that in the 6th century AD, after the death of arshavardhana, the powerful ruler ofThaneshvara, there was a power vacuum in north India. To maintain the social order, the Brahmins legitimized clans of invading adventurers from Central Asia as Agnikula, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas."


The city name  ANHILWARA:

The name of the capital city of Gujarat ANHILWARA (where letter W can take the values of UU, VV,  YY, UV, UY or VY), rearranged as "AYHAN-AR-ILU", is from the Turkish expression "AYHAN ER ILU" (AYHAN ER ILI) meaning "the country of Moon-Lord man", that is, "the house of Moon-Lord man".    

The name SOLANKI was shown to be related to the Sun in Turkish above, thus, in one meaning, this makes the termANHILWARA  SOLANKI to mean "the sunny house of Moon-Lord man".  Hence, this Turkish title identifies this King as being a Sun-God and Moon-God worshipping man.  This also verifies their claim that they were "descent from the sun and the moon", that is to say, they were Turanian Sun and Moon worshipping Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. 


The name AYHAN is a man's name in Turkish and means "Moon-lord".  The Gujarat people being the Kshatria (the Turk) people were known as the rulers and warriors of India with such adjectives, that is, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas. 

Thus all of these four Agnikula (GÜN KULU) people were Turkish peoples, whom the Brahmans asked to govern and protect again the people of India.  All of these explain and verify the fact that the Kshatriyas were Central Asiatic Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples.  as we will see further below.



The Wikipedia reference states:
"There are also leading Rajputs clans that claim descent from the sun and the moon and accordingly labeled themselves asSuryavanshi and Chandravanshi. One theory holds that in the 6th century AD, after the death of arshavardhana, the powerful ruler of Thaneshvara, there was a power vacuum in north India. To maintain the social order, the Brahmins legitimized clans of invading adventurers from Central Asia as Agnikula, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas."




The meaning of the above reference is that before the arrival of the so-called "invading adventurers from Central Asia", there was a city called Thaneshvara and its king was Arshavardhana.  To understand the true identity of these two names, let us read on.

a)    The name ARSHAVARDHANA, rearranged as "ARSH-DANRH-AVA-A", is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "ARŞ TANRI AVI O" (GÖK TANRI EVI O) meaning "It is the house of Sky-Lord".  This Turkish expression clearly identifies this "Ksahtriya" king as being a believer of the Turanian Sky-God - and his house and/or dynasty a"House of Gök Tanri".  Hence, they were the SKY TURKS (i.e., the "GÖK TURKS" in Turkish). 

Turkish word ARŞ means "sky" TANRI means "God" GÖK means "sky; blue" EV means "house; home, country; dynasty".

b)    The name ARSHAVARDHANA, rearranged as "ISHAR-DANRA-AVA", is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "IŞIR TANRI EVI"  meaning "House of Shining God", that is, "the House of  Sun".  This Turkish expression again identifies the House of king ARSHAVARDHANA as a king of "Ksahtriya", his house is being called a "House of Sun". 

Turkish word IŞIR means "shines" IŞIR TANRI means "Shining God", that is, "the Sun-God".

c)    Additionally, the name ARSHAVARDHANA, rearranged as "AVSHAR-AR-HAN'DA", is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "AVŞAR ER HAN'DI" meaning "He is Avshar Lord man". Furthermore, it means "He is Avshar Warrior Lord" With this kingly title, He states the AVŞAR name of his Turkish clan name (i.e., "Türk Boyu" in Turkish)!

d)   Similarly, the name ARSHAVARDHANA, rearranged as "AVSHAR-ARHAN'DA", is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "AVŞAR ERHAN'DI" meaning "He is Avshar ERHAN". With this definition he is stating his name as ERHAN which is a widely used Turkish name for men.   Thus the king's name was "ARHAN" (ERHAN)!

Turkish word AVŞAR is the name of "AVŞAR" Turks, who ruled in Iran and evidently in ancient India as well!   

It is interesting to note that after the death of ARSHAVARDHANA, that is, the King "AVŞAR ARHAN", it is said that "there was a power vacuum in north India. To maintain the social order, the Brahmins legitimized clans of invading adventurers from Central Asia as Agnikula, Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Kshatriyas."  The AVŞAR Turks  were  one of the most celebrated branch of Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples.  Presently, their deccendants are in Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkiye and most likely in India as well!



The city name THANESHVARA:

The name THANESHVARA, rearranged as "HSHA-TANRE-AV", is the restructured form of the Turkish expression "IŞITANRI EVI" meaning "house of the light-God", that is, "the House (country) of the Sun-God".  This, of course, refers to the house of Turanians that established, in the ancient sub-continent of India, the Sun Empire SURYAVANSHA, that is, the Shining Golden House of Turanians.  That is why India has the official name of "HINDUSTAN", that is, "HUNISTAN" and/or "GÜNISTAN". 

Turkish word IŞI means "light",  TANRI means "God" IŞI TANRI means "light God", that is, The SUN EV means "house".



The name 

In order to fill the position of the dead king ARSHAVARDHANA, the Brahmans approved and installed the incoming Central Asian Turks (whom they called "AGNIKULA") to take over the rulership of the country and to protect it.  But the nameAGNIKULA, rearranged as "GUN-KILI-A" or "GIN-KULI-A, is the altered, restructured and disguised form of the Turkish expression "GÜN KULU O" meaning "he is the loyal servant of the Sun" that is, "he is the worshipper of the Sun". That is what the Central Asian Turks were.  They were the "Children of the Sun" and their language of Turkish was "The SUN LANGUAGE" contrary to denials by those who do not have any rationale to deny it. 

The Indian name AGNI meaning "fire comes from Turkish word "GÜN" meaning "Sun". Sun is the most magnificent "fire" of them all!  

Turkish word KUL means "loyal servant", "the subjects of the Turanian Hakans and Sultans". 






Raghava Rama

Among all the Ramas of Sanskrit literature, Raghava Rama was the most famous. The epic Ramayana is all about this Rama. The word Ramayana means Rama's travels in Sanskrit. He was a Kshatriya king, in the Ikshwaku clan, in the lineage of a famous king Raghu, and hence called by the name Raghava Rama.


The term RAMAYANA (meaning "travels of Rama"), rearranged as "ARAYANAM", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritizedform of the Turkish expression "ARAYANAM" meaning "I am a wanderer", "I am a traveller".  Thus the source of the term was taken from Turkish. In view of this insight revelation, it is natural that RAMAYANA would mean "The Travels of Rama". But its original language was Turkish before it was anagrammatized. 

The term RAMAYANA (meaning "travels of Rama"), rearranged as "MAN-AY-ARA", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritizedform of the Turkish expression "MAN AY ERI" meaning "I am moon man", "I am moon believer".  RAMA is the personification of the "Moon-God". Thus, again the source of the term is from Turkish rather than "Sanskrit"! 

RAMA was a Kshatriya king, in the IKSHWAKU clan. He was from the lineage of a famous king RAGHU, and hence he was called RAGHAVA RAMA. 

The term IKSHWAKU, rearranged as "KUY-ISHUKA" or "KUK-ISHUYA" is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "GÖY IŞUKU" (GÖK IŞIGI) meaning "the sky light", that is, "the sun", "the sunlight", "the moon, or"the Moonlight". 

The term IKSHWAKU, rearranged as "KUY-AH-KUSI", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "GÖY AGA GÖZI"  (GÖK AGA GÖZI ) meaning "the Eye of the Sky-Lord" - which were the sun and moon.

The term RAGHU, rearranged as "UHGAR", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression"UYGUR" meaning "the Uighur (Turks)" 




Bhargava Rama:

Contrary to the identity of Raghava Rama, the Bhargava Rama was a Brahmin warrior who was also called Parashurama.  Thus, the identity of this Bhargava Rama is much more different from the identity of Raghava Rama.  This we will see below. 

The term BHARGAVA RAMA, rearranged as   "BR-GARA-MA-AHA-V",  is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "BiR GARA MA AHa" (BIR KARA AY AGA) meaning "One Black-Moon Lord".  So, this group of Rama was  a "black-moon believing people", that is, "evil (black)-moon-god believing house" under the pretext of "godly" Brahmin warrior.  They were secret planners and operators of all kinds of evil acts!

The term BHARGAVA RAMA, rearranged as "BARA-VGRAMA-HA" (BARA-VGRAMA-IA), is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "PARA UGRAMA ÖYÜ" (PARA OGRUMA ÖYÜ, PARA HIRSIZLAMA EVI)meaning "money stealing house" which most likely were the pre-runners of the present day "banks".  So this group of Rama were"money stealing thieves" under the pretext of being "godly" Brahmin warriors.  We will know more about them when we analyse the name PARASHURAMA below:




a)    The term PARASHURAMA, rearranged as "PARA-ASHURMA", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "PARA AŞURMA" meaning "stealing money" 

b)    The term PARASHURAMA, rearranged as "PARASHU-ARAM", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "PARACU ARAM" (or PARACU EREM) meaning "money dealer Arami" or  "I am money man" 

c)    The term PARASHURAMA, rearranged as "HARAM-PARASU", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "HARAM PARACU" meaning "unlawful money operator", "person who unlawfully acquires  money" 

d)    The term PARASHURAMA, rearranged as "PHARS-ARAMAU", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "FARS ARAMI" (PERS ARAMI'SI) meaning "Pers Aramean, Persian Aramaic" people.  [see entry "ARAMI" in the Redhouse Turkish-English Dictionary, 1987, p. 68].

e)    The term PARASHURAMA, rearranged as "PHR-ARAMASU-A", is the altered, restructured and Sanskritized form of the Turkish expression "BIR ARAMACU O" (BIR GEZGINCI O, BIR ÇINGENE O) meaning "one wanderer he is", "one Aramaic he is". 

It is no wonder that they, with other collaborators, instigated  the internal rebellion in Iran at year 559 B.C. to take over the ruling power of the Turanian MEDE Empire in Iran.  After the commotion (rebellion), the so-called "ACHAEMENIDE" dynasty was created in the Turanian country of Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples in ancient Iran.  When they came to power in Iran, they installed the "Aramaic" language as the official first language of Iran so-called "PERSIA" - thereby replacing the Turkish that was spoken before.  At the same time they manufactured a new so-called "Aryan" language of "Persian".  Since then, the same and similar thievery have been carried on in all fields without the people knowing about this secret plan of the "Black-moon Rama" peoples! 



The name BAHLIKA:


2.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahlikas 

"According to the Puranic traditions, Dhrshta was one of the nine sons of Manu. From him came a number of clans called Dharshtakas who were reckoned as Kshatriyas. According to Shiva Purana the Dharshtaka princes became rulers of Bahlika.

Kavyamimamsa of Rajshekhar (10th c AD) lists the Bahlikas with the Sakas, Tusharas, Vokanas, Hunas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Tangana, Turukshas, etc. and states them as the tribes located in the Uttarapatha division.

Besides Kambojas, Atharvaveda-Parisista also associates the Vedic Bahlikas with the Sakas, Yavanas and Tusharas (Saka-Yavana-Tukhara-Vahlikaishcha).

Thus, this Wikipedia reference source also identifies the noble Kshatriyas as being BAHLIKAS who were associated with 
the Sakas, Tusharas, Vokanas, Hunas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Tangana, Turukshas, etc. and states them as the tribes located in theUttarapatha division.  The name BAHLIKA seems to come from the name of lake "Baikal" in Central Asia named "BAIKAL GÖLÜ" in Turkish.   Evidently all of these Turanians were near Lake Baikal in the past before their spread in all directions on earth. 

So the person named "DHRSHTA" was one of the nine sons of MANU the Father of mankind - (i.e., "U MAN (O MEN, MEN O) in Turkish meaning "he/she/it is (was) me" and/or "me is (was) him/her/it").  By another word, the name MANU was another name of "ADAM" the first man, that is, the father of mankind, - (i.e., the Turkish word "ADAM" meana "man, mankind, ancestor of mankind, human", and similarly, the Turkish word "ATAM" means "my father, my ancestor father, ancestor of mankind"). Thus, the source of the name  MANU was Turkish, and so was the word ADAM (also so-called "ADEM")!

According to the Puranic traditions, from Dhrshta came a number of clans called Dharshtakas who were known as  Kshatriyas. Now, let us identify the name of Dharshtakas.

The name DHRSHTAKAS, rearranged as "DHRHST-SAKA" ("DIRIST-SAKA"), is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "DÜRÜST SAKA" (DOGRU SAKA) meaning "SAKA with 
perfect integrity, SAKA the correct, honest, straightforward man, Saka the trustable man".  The English word "trust" is an altered and Anglicized form of the Turkish word "DÜRÜST".

This expression in Turkish higlights the honest and trustable character of the Saka Turks. The term DHRSHT (i.e., DÜRÜST in Turkish) personifies the concepts of "honesty, fairness, justice, truth speaking, morally and physically good behaviour of man to man".   Since the so-called man DHRSHT (DÜRÜST) was the son of MANU the god and the father of human beings, hence he was a personification of one of God's attributions.  The name SAKA (also Aryanized name "Scythian") was a name of early Turks.  The Pelasgians and Troyans were also the SAKA Turks. The Trojan SCAEAN GATE (i.e., "SAKA KAPI" in Turkish) in Troy (TUR ÖY) carried their name. The Turkish word "SAKA" also means "he who deals with water activities such as fishing, sea transportation; sea going people; bringer of water; channellizer of water"   

Alternatively, the name DHRSHTAKAS, rearranged as "HST-DHR-SAKA" or "HSD-THR-SAKA" is the anagrammatized form of the Turkish expression "ÜST TUR SAKA" meaning "the top most TUR SAKA", i.e., the TUR SAKA people with 
perfect integrity, honesty, straightforwardnes and openness".  Thus the so-called DHRSHTAKAS were another name of the nobleKSHATHRIYA peoples, that is, they were the SAKA Turks. According to Shiva Purana, the Dharshtaka princes became rulers of Bahlika.  

It must be noted that if the name 
KSHATHRIYAS  was rearranged letter-by-letter as "IY-HRSHTAKAS", we get a form of the name DHRSHTAKAS, and similarly, if the name DHRSHTAKAS was rearranged letter-by-letter as "DS-KSHATRHA", we get a form of the name  KSHATHRIYA.  Thus, this illustrates to us the linguistic manipulations that these ancient Vedic writing Aryan Brahmins were doing in order to come up with alternative forms of words that they actually fabricated from ancient Turkish language phrases. 

The above  reference describes the BAHLIKAS people as being KSHATRIYA people, that is, being same as the Sakas, Tusharas, Vokanas, Hunas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Tangana, Turukshas, and others and states them as the tribes located in theUTTARAPATHA division. These names are the names of Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples whom I will discuss below. 

About the Indian word UTTARAPATHA: 

The Indian word UTTARAPATHA, meaning a division of Turanian peoples, rearranged as "TUR-APA-ATA-TH" , is the altered, and restructured form of the Turkish expression "TUR APAATA'TI" meaning "TUR is the Grandfather", that is,  "TUR is the ancestor father". This highlights and explains why the term UTTARAPATHA meant a division of Turanians, because they all had the common ancestor of TUR.  Of course, the names TUR, TURK, TURAN, TURANIAN all come from this name of "TUR APAATA" who was not only a name of the Turanian God, but also the ancestor name of the Turanians.  

It should be noted that even if we had deciphered the name  
UTTARAPATHA as "APA-ATA-TURTH", we would find the Turkish expression "APAATA TUR'dI) meaning "the Grandfather was TUR", that is, "the ancestor father was TUR", This is exactly the sames as the meaning of the first decipherment in Turkish! Thus the source and the meaning of the word UTTARAPATHA are from Turkish. 

See also the Wikipedia link at url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttarapatha

"A medieval era Hindu text Kavyamimamsa by Pandit Rajshekhara attests that Uttarapatha lay to the west of Prithudaka (modern Pehoa near Thaneswar in Haryana. The Kavyamimamsa further lists the Sakas, Vokkanas, Hunas, Kambojas, Keikayas, Bahlikas (Bactrians), Pahlavas, Lampakas, Kulutas, Tanganas, Tusharas, Turushakas (Turks), Barbaras among the tribes of Uttarapatha (Kavyamimamsa Chapter 17)."





"The Vedic Period (or Vedic Age) is the period during which the Vedas, texts related to early Indo-Aryan religion, were being composed, during the period of roughly the mid second to mid first millennium BCE.

The associated culture, sometimes referred to as Vedic civilization, was centered in the northern and northwestern parts of theIndian subcontinent.

Chronologically, its early phase overlaps with the Late Harappan period and its late phase with the rise of the Mahajanapadas(early Indo-Aryan kingdoms in India). After the end of the Vedic period, the Mahajanapadas in turn gave way to the Maurya Empire (from ca. 320 BCE), the golden age of classical Sanskrit literature."

In the above reference, when they say that 
"The Vedic Period (or Vedic Age) is the period during which the Vedas, texts relatedto early Indo-Aryan religion, were being composed", they actually and allegorically say that the Vedas writing priests were stealing the ancient Turanian language by way of altering and restructuring the Turkish words and phrases. This way, the Aryan Brahmin priests Indo-Aryanized everything that belonged to the ancient Turanian civilization in India. This also included the sneaky Aryanization of Turanian peoples in India.  All of this by "Aryan Brahmins" was aimed at and resulted in obliterating the ancient Turanians and their civilization from the history in India.  All of these secretive activities, under the guise of composing the early Indo-Aryan religious texts, took about one thousand years between the mid-second millennium B. C. and the mid-first Millennium B.C.  In that time, the priests first killed the ancient Turanian religion, that is, the most ancient religion of the world, while transferring everything about it into newly manufactured languages such as the "Sanskrit" and also to other newly fabricated "Aryan and Semitic" languages. The priests, with the use of what they learned from the ancient world wide Turanian civilization, composed new religions that were used to divide and polarize the public into religious compartments.  Such division and confusion technique was conveniently used as a means to conquer, control and exploit the public. 

The above reference refers to the rise of the so-called MAHAJANAPADAS, that is, the early Indo-Aryan kingdoms in India. When we decipher this name, we get enlightening results. 

The name MAHAJANAPADA, that is, the early Indo-Aryan kingdoms in India, rearranged as "MA-JAHAN-APADA", is made up from Turkish expression "MA (AY) CIHAN APADI" meaning "The moon is universal Father".  This means that the priest killed the ancient Turanian Sky-Father-God with Sun and moon being the eyes of the Sky-Father-God, they secretly deified the Moon as the universal god. Thus, Sun worshipping was abandoned and in its place Moon worshipping was adopted. 
Turkish word MA (MAH, AY) means "moon" CIHAN means "universe; world", APA means "father; grandfather". 

Similarly, the name MAHAJANAPADA, that is, the early Indo-Aryan kingdoms in India, rearranged as "MA-AJHAN-APADA", is made up from Turkish expression "MA (MAH) AYHAN APADI" meaning "Ma (Mah) is Ayhan the Moon Father".  The Turkish name AYHAN, meaning "Moon Lord", was the name of one of the six sons of Oguz Kagan.

This identifies the dominant moon woshipping, that is, the beginning of "Chandravansha" or Lunar Dynasty in India. With this the so-called Indo-Aryanized MAHAJANAPADA, that is, the  moon worshipping and supposedly early Indo-Aryan kingdoms in India, replaced the Sun Dynasty or Solar Dynasty or Suryavansha in India.






"Tusharas (alias Tukharas, Tocharians) were a Mleccha tribe, with their kingdom located in the north west of India as per the epic Mahabharata. An account in Mahabharata (Mbh 1:85) depicts Mlechchas as the descendants of Anu, one of the cursed sons of king Yayati. Yayati's eldest son Yadu, gave rise to the Yadavas and youngest son Puru to the Pauravas that includes the Kurusand Panchalas. Only the fifth son of Puru's line was considered to be the successors of Yayati's throne, as he cursed the other four sons and denied them kingship. Pauravas inherited the Yayati's original empire and stayed in the Gangatic plain who later created the Kuru and Panchala Kingdoms. They were the followers of proper Vedic culture. Yadavas made central and western India their stronghold. The descendants of Anu, also called Anavas migrated to Iran, of which the Tusharas settled inTurkmenistan, Turkistan (in Afghanistan) and Turkey. The Tushara country mentioned in the epic could be Turkmenistan, aCentral Asian Republic or the Turkistan of Afghanistan.

The Atharavaveda-Parishishta[1] associates the Tusharas (Tocharians) with the Sakas (Scyths), Yavanas/Yonas (Indo-Greeks) and the Bahlikas (Bactrians) (Saka.Yavana.Tushara.Bahlikashcha). It also juxtaposes the Kambojas with the Bahlikas (Kamboja-Bahlika...).[2]

This shows that the Tusharas were probably neighbours to these peoples, possibly in Transoxiana."

This reference by Wikipedia also identifies Thusharas as Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz people in India. 




1.    All the references cited in this study, related to the ancient Kshatriya rulers and peoples of India, clearly define them as the Central Asiatic Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples who moved into India thousands of years ago and carried on with their ancient civilization with exceptional upright ruling and fearless military and heroic defending capabilities when necessary. This military capability is even embedded in the name KSHATRIYA with the Turkish word ASKERIYATI, meaning "house of soldiers". As the references indicate, the KSHATRIYAs were all over the Indian subcontinent. 

2.   All of the names or words that I deciphered above, which are regarded as Sanskrit or Indo-Aryan words, were actually "linguistically engineered" words that were anagrammatized from ancient Turkish into what is presently called "Aryan" languages.  The Turkish words and phrases that were altered, restructured and Aryanized , although having lost their Turkish identity, did not lose their substance in the fabricated Aryan words.  They are still present, although in confused forms, in those alienated Aryan word formats. All of these again corroborate what is stated in Genesis 11 as "Let us go down there and confuse their language so that they do not understand one another".  Supposedly, this was a religious order issued by an invisible God yet it is a total falsehood contrived by supposedly "religious godly" people who were actually magicians, sorcerers and con artists of Babylon.

3.    The name KSHATRIYA , first of all, is an alienated name that has the name TURK embedded in it. This identifies the ancientKSHATRIYA tribes of India as the Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to its confused format.  Additionally, the term KSHATRIYA is, what I call, a  "one word" information storage system (memory, container) somehow built into Aryanized words. The relevant Turanian information stored in its written verbal format is revealed when it is deciphered in different ways, but in Turkish.  

4.    Once again, the power of the decipherment capability of the Turkish language has been demonstrated in this study. I have shown that no matter how much a Turkish word or phrase has been altered, restructured and disguised in the words of some languages, the monosyllabic nature of Turkish, together with the meaning associated with the restructured word, helps to decipher the word being examined.  In this regard, the mono-syllables of the Turkish language can be likened to the engraved elementary bricks of an ancient bulding.  When the building is destroyed, most of the elementary bricks are still intact and hence, can be found. Thus my decipherments are linguistic excavations - just like the excavation of a ruined building.

5.    With so many decipherments of the so-called "Indo-Aryan" Sanskrit words and names, this study proved that Sanskrit was also manufactured from Turkish, just as all other Aryan and Semite languages were.  Clearly, Sanskrit was an artificially engineered language from Turkish!

6.    I showed that the Kshatriya peoples of ancient India (Hindustan) were Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples and that they were the rulers and protectors of ancient India. Hence, even many of the present peoples of India have a very close connection with the Turks of Central Asia.  It is for that reason that ancient India has also been mentioned among the ancient Turanians, just like the names of Turanians in Hyde Clark's paper mentioned above. Evidently, they all belonged to one great group, that is, a family of families of allied Turanian languages preceeding the so-called "Hellenic culture".  In Hindustan history, the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples, called "Kshatrias", had coexisted with other native and/or migrant groups.

7.    I showed that the term "Kshatriya", and its derivatives, embodied many Turkish expressions having meanings that identified them as kings, rulers, soldiers, generals, nobles; and also names such as Turk, Oguz, Azer, Saka, Uygur, Kirgiz, Hun, Avar, Ayhan, Göyhan (Gökhan), AL BAŞ, KIZIL BAŞ, ALAV and many others.

8.   This study is contrary to other linguistic comparisons done by modern linguists - which I believe are based on falsehood.  After all, if the words of the known languages were made up from a basic monosyllabic agglutinative language (i.e., Turkish) whose words and phrases were altered, restructured, and camouflaged into new words of an alien language, then the resultant manufactured words of the new languages (e.g., Sanskrit and other Aryan languages) cannot be linguistically compared with the original Turkish sourcetext - because that would a superficial comparison which results in no valid findings. This is because no visual or audible relationship is left to compare and connect with.  Additionally the words of the Aryan and Semitic languages are mostly made up from altered Turkish phrases - rather than simple words - therefore the present linguistic comparisons are being done between altered phrases and known Turkish words - which is like comparing apples and oranges.  This loaded dice comparison has been strongly promoted by modern linguists as a linguistic comparison method - thus guiding the readers and learners down the wrong path.  The only way to make the true connection is the way that I have been doing - which is, to extract the basic Turkish source text embedded in the Aryan and Semitic words by decipherment, that is, by reverse engineering.  Of course this requires a good knowledge of Turkish and the old Turkish culture!

9.   This presentation will enlighten the ancient history and mythology of India with new insight and understanding. The history of the ancient Turanian people and the ancient Turanian KSHATRIYA people, who were all sun worshipping people and whose civilisation and grandeur were intentionally darkened - and then, attributed to black-believing Aryans, will come back into daylight once again!

With best wishes to all, 

Polat Kaya

 25/05/2010 - 20/04/2011)